Zimmerman trial has now begun

"Legal analysts" expect a verdict tonight. That usually means not guilty. Not always, but usually. Interesting to see how this goes.

And the crowd is growing outside the courthouse in FL.
 
unionmom said:
"Legal analysts" expect a verdict tonight. That usually means not guilty. Not always, but usually. Interesting to see how this goes.

And the crowd is growing outside the courthouse in FL.

One of the reasons I wondered how away from all the media they have been.
 
ShoeDiva said:
unionmom said:
"Legal analysts" expect a verdict tonight. That usually means not guilty. Not always, but usually. Interesting to see how this goes.

And the crowd is growing outside the courthouse in FL.

One of the reasons I wondered how away from all the media they have been.

They are chanting rather loudly. You'd like to think the jury is well and truly sequestered from it but I can't help but worry about any corruption of the process.
 
Jury is done for the day ... back at it tomorrow morning, 9 a.m.

I am more than a little concerned about one analyst's comment about the jury knowing the weight of their decision on the community. That is so very, very wrong and I hope like heck he was just projecting and guessing and assuming, etc. The jury should not give a rat's butt about the community when deciding this case. They should care only about the evidence before them and a fair verdict for the charged based on that evidence.

The only way I can calm down and accept what he was saying is if he meant they want to be sure to give it time to be sure they are not seen to give a flippant, non-caring vote ... be sure that it is clear that they did give true weight to the case before rendering a fair verdict based only on the evidence. Still a bit twisted to me because every other case out there doesn't get the pressure and scrutiny the media and special interest groups have forced on this one but as long as the verdict is true to the evidence as they perceived it ...
 
unionmom said:
ShoeDiva said:
unionmom said:
"Legal analysts" expect a verdict tonight. That usually means not guilty. Not always, but usually. Interesting to see how this goes.

And the crowd is growing outside the courthouse in FL.

One of the reasons I wondered how away from all the media they have been.

They are chanting rather loudly. You'd like to think the jury is well and truly sequestered from it but I can't help but worry about any corruption of the process.

I do hope so.
 
unionmom said:
Jury is done for the day ... back at it tomorrow morning, 9 a.m.

I am more than a little concerned about one analyst's comment about the jury knowing the weight of their decision on the community. That is so very, very wrong and I hope like heck he was just projecting and guessing and assuming, etc. The jury should not give a rat's butt about the community when deciding this case. They should care only about the evidence before them and a fair verdict for the charged based on that evidence.

The only way I can calm down and accept what he was saying is if he meant they want to be sure to give it time to be sure they are not seen to give a flippant, non-caring vote ... be sure that it is clear that they did give true weight to the case before rendering a fair verdict based only on the evidence. Still a bit twisted to me because every other case out there doesn't get the pressure and scrutiny the media and special interest groups have forced on this one but as long as the verdict is true to the evidence as they perceived it ...

:agreed

100%
 
unionmom said:
ShoeDiva said:
unionmom said:
"Legal analysts" expect a verdict tonight. That usually means not guilty. Not always, but usually. Interesting to see how this goes.

And the crowd is growing outside the courthouse in FL.

One of the reasons I wondered how away from all the media they have been.

They are chanting rather loudly. You'd like to think the jury is well and truly sequestered from it but I can't help but worry about any corruption of the process.


At one point last night, a reporter on WSB radio said that the "crowd" outside the courthouse was easily outnumbered by the media and the police.
 
They weren't huge by numbers at that point at all, no. But they were being very loud. The volume was my issue. The media is insane, no doubt. I do hope that the jury is somehow able to be brought in some way each day that has minimized their exposure to the media. Surely they have some clue how much attention this is getting. I don't see how they couldn't. Wouldn't it be a happy little dream world if all cases could be decided in a vacuum?
 
Hey let's go down to the courthouse and get on TV!! Rodney King! Rodney King!

Sent from a small screen using fat thumbs.
 
Re: Re: Zimmerman trial has now begun

unionmom said:
Shall we meet at the old courthouse in Dallas? (nicer setting)
We need to go to Lanna if we want to be on CNN.

Sent from a small screen using fat thumbs.
 
Re: Re: Zimmerman trial has now begun

Madea said:
unionmom said:
Wow ... the State has fired their IT guy apparently because of his testimony. Holy cow.

What'd he say? :eek:
http://m.wesh.com/news/state-attorney-fires-it-director-after-george-zimmerman-testimony/-/15560370/20964368/-/ktsakgz/-/index.html

Sent from a small screen using fat thumbs.
 
More comprehensive piece:

http://m.jacksonville.com/news/metro/2013-07-13/story/state-attorney-angela-corey-fires-information-techonology-director-who

Sent from a small screen using fat thumbs.
 
“Your egregious lack of regard for the sensitive nature of the information handled by this office is completely abhorrent,” Peek wrote. “You have proven to be completely untrustworthy. Because of your deliberate, wilful and unscrupulous actions, you can never again be trusted to step foot in this office.”

Read more at Jacksonville.com: http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2013-07-13/story/state-attorney-angela-corey-fires-information-techonology-director-who#ixzz2Ywakfs2f
 
Back
Top