I asked you if this was correct?LisaC date=1430941786 said:So now my beliefs are in question... :spitchick :spitchick :spitchick :spitchick
Wow, this is getting good. What else do you wanna say about me?
I asked you if this was correct?LisaC date=1430941786 said:So now my beliefs are in question... :spitchick :spitchick :spitchick :spitchick
Wow, this is getting good. What else do you wanna say about me?
Does that mean that I win for staying out of it?mrnn date=1430883566 said:Let's just agree to disagree...this won't end well if we keep it up
Just so that we're clear that I'm not running away from a debate, I want it to be recognized that it's impossible to "win" a philosophical debate, especially one rooted in interpretation of a book written by man 2000+ years ago that claims to speak for a "God" that we can't prove exists. There's just no way we can discuss issues like these without being on the same philosophical plane. I do respect your faith, I just don't have that same faith.
So how about those Hawks? 8)
mrnn
Chickenlotstodo date=1430944132 said:Does that mean that I win for staying out of it?mrnn date=1430883566 said:Let's just agree to disagree...this won't end well if we keep it up
Just so that we're clear that I'm not running away from a debate, I want it to be recognized that it's impossible to "win" a philosophical debate, especially one rooted in interpretation of a book written by man 2000+ years ago that claims to speak for a "God" that we can't prove exists. There's just no way we can discuss issues like these without being on the same philosophical plane. I do respect your faith, I just don't have that same faith.
So how about those Hawks? 8)
mrnn
lotstodo date=1430944132 said:Does that mean that I win for staying out of it?mrnn date=1430883566 said:Let's just agree to disagree...this won't end well if we keep it up
Just so that we're clear that I'm not running away from a debate, I want it to be recognized that it's impossible to "win" a philosophical debate, especially one rooted in interpretation of a book written by man 2000+ years ago that claims to speak for a "God" that we can't prove exists. There's just no way we can discuss issues like these without being on the same philosophical plane. I do respect your faith, I just don't have that same faith.
So how about those Hawks? 8)
mrnn
LisaC date=1430944006 said:No, you didn't ask - you implied...
Guard Dad date=1430945265 said:LisaC date=1430944006 said:No, you didn't ask - you implied...
I gave you a chance to correct me.
So I will ask...do you support same-sex marriage?
If yes, how do you reconcile that belief with the Bible?
Madea date=1431028563 said:Do we really have scientific proof that animals can be homosexual, but we're still waiting on the same proof in humans? :cantbelievemyeyes
Yes and yes. I believe that the human studies have not been going on long, but I am unsure of the process or progress.Madea date=1431028563 said:Do we really have scientific proof that animals can be homosexual, but we're still waiting on the same proof in humans? :cantbelievemyeyes