Paulette

[sadie612]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

can I not talk about glitter tooting unicorns no more????????!!!!!!!!!?????

Please! Keep talking about glitter and unicorns. (Notice I left out tooting.)

this one time I won a unicorn and held it up and said"It's So Fluffy"


oh wait

that is Despicable ME!!! I wanna add I can not WAIT till the 2nd one comes out!

 

[newsjunky]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

Yes ma'am. But even without the name calling, his comments still have me on my broomstick. :tapfoot2

I understand. You have been polite and presented facts and I for one appreciate that.

 

[LisaC]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

can I not talk about glitter tooting unicorns no more????????!!!!!!!!!?????

I know where you will find a glitter tooting unicorn [deleting mean comment - I wouldn't do that to a unicorn]!!!

who tinkled in your coffee this morning.. i sure didn't so be nice silly

Oh great - I have to deal with this little man AND someone tinkled in my coffee. Is today Monday?

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

Just for the record...I, in no way was referring to anyone on "this" site as a meat head as I stated NO names.

My reference was directed to others not on this site that have done things to Paulette 2 years ago are doing to same garbage this time, but even more devious.

LisaC, I have not seen anything you've done for you to consider my comment was directed at you. I am sorry you took it that way because it wasn't so.

My points is this....no one disputes the documents. What I am disputing is that "some" do not care 1 penny of the other side of all of this and what has been going on for some time now with her business dealings. The "others" do not care of the other side because for one, they have hated her for some time now and they continue that hatred today. They will not bother to ask her but only to present one-side and one-side only. Again, those who I was speaking about, this is nothing new.

I cannot name who I am talking about but rest assured, my comment was not directed at you, Lisa or even BB.

I am sorry if you took it that way.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

Yes ma'am. But even without the name calling, his comments still have me on my broomstick. :tapfoot2

don't let him get to you like that...he smirks and likes it like that

he knows not what he says half the time anyway..he has been banned from one place, it is just a matter of time before he is here... let him hang his own self silly

Stay out of this, Sadie. Do not judge someone unless you know what I am thinking and my intent was.

Thank you.

 

[sadie612]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

can I not talk about glitter tooting unicorns no more????????!!!!!!!!!?????

I know where you will find a glitter tooting unicorn [deleting mean comment - I wouldn't do that to a unicorn]!!!

who tinkled in your coffee this morning.. i sure didn't so be nice silly

Oh great - I have to deal with this little man AND someone tinkled in my coffee. Is today Monday?

lol..poor thing

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

I called no one here anything, NJ. Read my latest post. Since we are to not refer to no where else...I had to term it in a way that "I" thought was understand. In any event, I apologized to LisaC to the way she felt as nothing I said referred to her or anyone else on this site. I wish someone for once ask privately instead of assuming. I am an outspoken person and I hold back nothing. However, if my communication is miscontrued, I usually like I just did responded in clarification. We are on a message board and sometimes things get taken the wrong way.

 

[sadie612]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

Yes ma'am. But even without the name calling, his comments still have me on my broomstick. :tapfoot2

don't let him get to you like that...he smirks and likes it like that

he knows not what he says half the time anyway..he has been banned from one place, it is just a matter of time before he is here... let him hang his own self silly

Stay out of this, Sadie. Do not judge someone unless you know what I am thinking and my intent was.

Thank you.

you are so not a nice person.. did I say any names or screen names ( I know how anal you are about be uttering your name) I did not... You need a big does of Midol.

so if you can say my name them I will start back saying/typing yours

So let me get this straight.. you are asking me to stay out of a PUBLIC( not private) forum... i don't think that how is works

you have also just guaranteed me to answer every thread of yours. It might not be on topic but .. well y'all are use to that

 

[LisaC]

Just for the record...I, in no way was referring to anyone on "this" site as a meat head as I stated NO names.

My reference was directed to others not on this site that have done things to Paulette 2 years ago are doing to same garbage this time, but even more devious.

LisaC, I have not seen anything you've done for you to consider my comment was directed at you. I am sorry you took it that way because it wasn't so.

My points is this....no one disputes the documents. What I am disputing is that "some" do not care 1 penny of the other side of all of this and what has been going on for some time now with her business dealings. The "others" do not care of the other side because for one, they have hated her for some time now and they continue that hatred today. They will not bother to ask her but only to present one-side and one-side only. Again, those who I was speaking about, this is nothing new.

I cannot name who I am talking about but rest assured, my comment was not directed at you, Lisa or even BB.

I am sorry if you took it that way.

You ARE disputing the documents. You continually gloss over the fact that Paulette has legal issues. FACTS are FACTS. She has them, we all know it and she knows it too. I'm sure there are several reasons why she has these problems and some may or may not be her fault, but they are her issues nonetheless. For you to dismiss them and make a half-baked comment that people who see the court documents can't see what is going on is ridiculous.

Paulette may very well be the best candidate in the race, but you are hurting her campaign by trying to act like these issues aren't the elephant in the room. Everyone knows about them, but Paulette hasn't addressed them and as long as she doesn't, they will continue to be an issue.

As for not naming who you are talking about, that's horse hockey. If you have something to say to someone, say it, own it, and live by it. When you make blind statements like that, you're likely to offend the wrong person.

I'm gonna have to pray for you, Chris. The Lord hasn't given me enough grace to not want to smack you up side the head right now.

I'm posting this now because I keep changing things...

 

[sadie612]

Lisa he might ban you from typing the word Chris like he did me...

 

[LisaC]

Lisa he might ban you from typing the word Chris like he did me...

Girl, you know I'm skeered...

I called no one here anything, NJ. Read my latest post. Since we are to not refer to no where else...I had to term it in a way that "I" thought was understand. In any event, I apologized to LisaC to the way she felt as nothing I said referred to her or anyone else on this site. I wish someone for once ask privately instead of assuming. I am an outspoken person and I hold back nothing. However, if my communication is miscontrued, I usually like I just did responded in clarification. We are on a message board and sometimes things get taken the wrong way.

You apologize for the way I feel... That's very noble of you.

Somebody, please help this boy.

 

[newsjunky]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

Yes ma'am. But even without the name calling, his comments still have me on my broomstick. :tapfoot2

don't let him get to you like that...he smirks and likes it like that

he knows not what he says half the time anyway..he has been banned from one place, it is just a matter of time before he is here... let him hang his own self silly

Stay out of this, Sadie. Do not judge someone unless you know what I am thinking and my intent was.

Thank you.

S.T.O.P. while you are ahead Chris. Enough already get back on topic please. Think it was about Paulette and her campaign.

 

[sadie612]

it isn't glittery but made me lol

[attachment deleted by admin]

 

[newsjunky]

it isn't glittery but made me lol

Now don't you start!!!! :Stick

 

[sadie612]

where can we email Paulette and tell her people like this is bad for her campaign and the reason I am not voting for her..since I was told to stay on topic( that is hard for me because so many shiny things run through my head)

 

[LisaC]

Meat Head is taking a walk... I need chocolate. And, if anyone even thinks about tinkling on it, I'm smacking the snot out of them!

 

[sadie612]

it isn't glittery but made me lol

Now don't you start!!!! :Stick

but..but..but... i, um .. yes.ma am

 

[sadie612]

Meat Head is taking a walk... I need chocolate. And, if anyone even thinks about tinkling on it, I'm smacking the snot out of them!

i am eating dilled goat cheese dip with pita

 

[ShoeDiva]

where can we email Paulette and tell her people like this is bad for her campaign and the reason I am not voting for her..since I was told to stay on topic( that is hard for me because so many shiny things run through my head)

I read all the pages was just going to leave but that deserves a :laugh. You crack me up Sadie!

 

[newsjunky]

where can we email Paulette and tell her people like this is bad for her campaign and the reason I am not voting for her..since I was told to stay on topic( that is hard for me because so many shiny things run through my head)

I read all the pages was just going to leave but that deserves a :laugh. You crack me up Sadie!

Well, I need to be serious and I am :laugh :donlaugh :laugh