Paulette

[newsjunky]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

HUH? ? ?

Think he may be speaking of some comments made at another site. They were ridiculous.

 

[ShoeDiva]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

HUH? ? ?

Yup....they have, public statements, regardless of jokes or not. It was in bad taste and uncalled for.

I hate to hear that.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

HUH? ? ?

Think he may be speaking of some comments made at another site. They were ridiculous.

Yup....it was not nice and uncalled for. Ticked me off.

 

[LisaC]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

 

[Beach Bum]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

EXACTLY!!!

 

[ShoeDiva]

Lisa did he ADD that to his statement? I quoted the original post and it didn't have that second line in it. I just want you to know I did not delete anything when I quoted and I totally would have said something about calling people names. I do believe people have been ugly to Paulette, but I also believe that the documents are true. That there is things happening going on behind the scenes? Maybe, I do not know.

 

[LisaC]

Lisa did he ADD that to his statement? I quoted the original post and it didn't have that second line in it. I just want you to know I did not delete anything when I quoted and I totally would have said something about calling people names. I do believe people have been ugly to Paulette, but I also believe that the documents are true. That there is things happening going on behind the scenes? Maybe, I do not know.

I can't tell if he added it or not. :rant I've inhaled an additional cup of coffee since I typed my response a few minutes ago and I need something stronger - to imply that I'm putting 1/2 truths out there when the documents clearly speak for themselves really pushes my buttons (in case you can't tell).

Paulette may be the nicest, most misunderstood person on the planet, but she has a lot of legal problems.

:tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2

I'm deleting more than I'm typing so I'm walking away for a bit because that usually means I can't think of anything nice to say... :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

 

[sadie612]

Play nice boys. Ya hear? Or I'll get my leather belt out!

and this is suppose to skeer me!!! :Ninja

i am leaving her section blank on the ballot ... i can not vote for nobody in this section

 

[ShoeDiva]

Lisa did he ADD that to his statement? I quoted the original post and it didn't have that second line in it. I just want you to know I did not delete anything when I quoted and I totally would have said something about calling people names. I do believe people have been ugly to Paulette, but I also believe that the documents are true. That there is things happening going on behind the scenes? Maybe, I do not know.

I can't tell if he added it or not. :rant I've inhaled an additional cup of coffee since I typed my response a few minutes ago and I need something stronger - to imply that I'm putting 1/2 truths out there when the documents clearly speak for themselves really pushes my buttons (in case you can't tell).

Paulette may be the nicest, most misunderstood person on the planet, but she has a lot of legal problems.

:tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2 :tapfoot2

I'm deleting more than I'm typing so I'm walking away for a bit because that usually means I can't think of anything nice to say... :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

 

[newsjunky]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

 

[LisaC]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

 

[sadie612]

this one time at band camp... we didn't discuss politics and we all got along, smiled and giggles while riding unicorns on rainbows while tooting glitter

 

[Madea]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

 

[sadie612]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

can I not talk about glitter tooting unicorns no more????????!!!!!!!!!?????

 

[LisaC]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

can I not talk about glitter tooting unicorns no more????????!!!!!!!!!?????

I know where you will find a glitter tooting unicorn [deleting mean comment - I wouldn't do that to a unicorn]!!!

 

[Madea]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

can I not talk about glitter tooting unicorns no more????????!!!!!!!!!?????

Please! Keep talking about glitter and unicorns. (Notice I left out tooting.)

 

[newsjunky]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

 

[LisaC]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

Yes ma'am. But even without the name calling, his comments still have me on my broomstick. :tapfoot2

 

[sadie612]

It was edited due to a rule violation.

can I not talk about glitter tooting unicorns no more????????!!!!!!!!!?????

I know where you will find a glitter tooting unicorn [deleting mean comment - I wouldn't do that to a unicorn]!!!

who tinkled in your coffee this morning.. i sure didn't so be nice silly

 

[sadie612]

Yeah and nothing like attacking her sexually....by the usual idiots. :rant

And all everyone sees are court documents but have zero clues of what is going on behind the scenes

Now wait just a cotton pickin minute!!! I'm taking some personal offense here. I've spent over 20 years working in litigation and I can easily see what court documents mean. Yes, there is usually some negotiation back and forth between parties, but you can bet your sweet bippy that when an Judge issues a CONTEMPT order, that it is to be taken seriously. There is no room for "behind the scenes" when you are dealing with contempt of court. The defendants in the Xerox case have "officially" disregarded the Court's order to the point that the Judge has said pay up or go to jail. I say officially disregarded simply because there is nothing (zip, zero, nada) on the Court record to reflect that there has been any attempt by Defendants to appeal, argue or quash the fact that they are in contempt. And, I can tell you that if there were any type of objection or negotiation on that, there should have been something filed with the Court to preserve those objections in the record. And, when you throw in the fact, that her former attorneys paid their portion of the contempt charges - there has to have been some merit there in the first place.

I need more coffee!!! :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2 :rant :tapfoot2

Signed your local "meat-head" :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant :rant

I did not see that comment before and I have edited it. It will be edited in your response also. Sorry I did not catch it to begin with. I am not sure it was there to begin with.

Editing what he wrote doesn't change the fact that he said it so there is no need to soften it. I would prefer that it be changed back to what he said - if he wants to make comments like that, leave them there so he can stand behind what he says.

Signed,
Meat Head! :rant

No it doesn't but we do not call folks names on this site and as far as I am concerned it is a warning.

Yes ma'am. But even without the name calling, his comments still have me on my broomstick. :tapfoot2

don't let him get to you like that...he smirks and likes it like that

he knows not what he says half the time anyway..he has been banned from one place, it is just a matter of time before he is here... let him hang his own self silly