Paulette

newsjunky said:
ShoeDiva said:
sadie612 said:
where can we email Paulette and tell her people like this is bad for her campaign and the reason I am not voting for her..since I was told to stay on topic( that is hard for me because so many shiny things run through my head)
I read all the pages was just going to leave but that deserves a :laugh. You crack me up Sadie!
Well, I need to be serious and I am :laugh :donlaugh :laugh
laughing is always better than being pissy ...just sayin
 
sadie612 said:
newsjunky said:
ShoeDiva said:
sadie612 said:
where can we email Paulette and tell her people like this is bad for her campaign and the reason I am not voting for her..since I was told to stay on topic( that is hard for me because so many shiny things run through my head)
I read all the pages was just going to leave but that deserves a :laugh. You crack me up Sadie!
Well, I need to be serious and I am :laugh :donlaugh :laugh
laughing is always better than being pissy ...just sayin
So are you into name calling now? I need a bigger stick!
 
Who knew ...

UnicornsFartGlitterAndCurlyFries3.JPG


They really do toot glitter.
 
I have cheesecake - don't make me put my fork down.... This might get me back to my happy place....
 
newsjunky said:
sadie612 said:
newsjunky said:
ShoeDiva said:
sadie612 said:
where can we email Paulette and tell her people like this is bad for her campaign and the reason I am not voting for her..since I was told to stay on topic( that is hard for me because so many shiny things run through my head)
I read all the pages was just going to leave but that deserves a :laugh. You crack me up Sadie!
Well, I need to be serious and I am :laugh :donlaugh :laugh
laughing is always better than being pissy ...just sayin
So are you into name calling now? I need a bigger stick!

who did I call a name I said attitudes not names.. I will get my stick too
 
note to the hwy.. I TRIED TO STAY ON TOPIC but others poked me with a stick)

they liked my topic better lol
 
Back to your regular programming . . .

Okay, for example, the "website" shows a mugshot from the 90s and early 2000. One of those was a domestic violence arrest. When I learned about this I discussed it with both Paulette and her former husband. Yes, I know them both. What is never discussed on the particular "website" is that she was never even indicted on the domestic violence. So, yes, you see an arrest. But there is A LOT beyond that arrest that she will never make public, even if it is to her own detriment. This couple has children together. And yet, someone with an agenda feels the need to re-hash this yet again.
 
newsjunky said:
sadie612 said:
note to the hwy.. I TRIED TO STAY ON TOPIC but others poked me with a stick)

they liked my topic better lol
My stick is bigger and don't you forget it! :tapfoot2

i hear some people say size doesnt matter... but i believe you

i will behave for now....

so, how about them_________ ( insert fave sports team here)
 
Madea said:
Back to your regular programming . . .

Okay, for example, the "website" shows a mugshot from the 90s and early 2000. One of those was a domestic violence arrest. When I learned about this I discussed it with both Paulette and her former husband. Yes, I know them both. What is never discussed on the particular "website" is that she was never even indicted on the domestic violence. So, yes, you see an arrest. But there is A LOT beyond that arrest that she will never make public, even if it is to her own detriment. This couple has children together. And yet, someone with an agenda feels the need to re-hash this yet again.

awwww, the kids are innocent by standers...that sucks
 
Madea said:
Back to your regular programming . . .

Okay, for example, the "website" shows a mugshot from the 90s and early 2000. One of those was a domestic violence arrest. When I learned about this I discussed it with both Paulette and her former husband. Yes, I know them both. What is never discussed on the particular "website" is that she was never even indicted on the domestic violence. So, yes, you see an arrest. But there is A LOT beyond that arrest that she will never make public, even if it is to her own detriment. This couple has children together. And yet, someone with an agenda feels the need to re-hash this yet again.
Just helping with the back on topic issue. All good points Madea.
 
Madea said:
Back to your regular programming . . .

Okay, for example, the "website" shows a mugshot from the 90s and early 2000. One of those was a domestic violence arrest. When I learned about this I discussed it with both Paulette and her former husband. Yes, I know them both. What is never discussed on the particular "website" is that she was never even indicted on the domestic violence. So, yes, you see an arrest. But there is A LOT beyond that arrest that she will never make public, even if it is to her own detriment. This couple has children together. And yet, someone with an agenda feels the need to re-hash this yet again.

That stuff is old news -- if they ever kept up with the number of times a person has been pulled over, you would see that I've been pulled over so many times that my DL needs a bar code on it. BUT, if you saw the actual number of tickets actually given, you might think I drive like a grandma. That stuff is history and its irrelevant.

The current litigation, however, needs to be rectified.
 
LisaC said:
Madea said:
Back to your regular programming . . .

Okay, for example, the "website" shows a mugshot from the 90s and early 2000. One of those was a domestic violence arrest. When I learned about this I discussed it with both Paulette and her former husband. Yes, I know them both. What is never discussed on the particular "website" is that she was never even indicted on the domestic violence. So, yes, you see an arrest. But there is A LOT beyond that arrest that she will never make public, even if it is to her own detriment. This couple has children together. And yet, someone with an agenda feels the need to re-hash this yet again.

That stuff is old news -- if they ever kept up with the number of times a person has been pulled over, you would see that I've been pulled over so many times that my DL needs a bar code on it. BUT, if you saw the actual number of tickets actually given, you might think I drive like a grandma. That stuff is history and its irrelevant.

The current litigation, however, needs to be rectified.

I agree that it's old news. But, in an effort to skew the public, this website is using that mugshot. and discussing that arrest. Like I said, that's just one example of what I was referring to as twisting and skewing the truth. I don't really have time for the others. And, I draw the line at releasing folks personal business that hasn't already been released.
 
Folks - Calm down, please. We have one major rule on the political forum (aside from the site rules) and that is;

"Notice: All opinions are welcome here, but we expect discussions to remain civil."

It's election time and emotions are high. But the fine folks on The Hwy should be capable of taking the high road.

I'll leave this topic open only if you guys can keep tempers in check.

Thanks
 
Guard Dad said:
Folks - Calm down, please. We have one major rule on the political forum (aside from the site rules) and that is;

"Notice: All opinions are welcome here, but we expect discussions to remain civil."

It's election time and emotions are high. But the fine folks on The Hwy should be capable of taking the high road.

I'll leave this topic open only if you guys can keep tempers in check.

Thanks
OH YEAH!!!! Well Unionmom pulled out the first farting Unicorn!!!!
 
Guard Dad said:
Folks - Calm down, please. We have one major rule on the political forum (aside from the site rules) and that is;

"Notice: All opinions are welcome here, but we expect discussions to remain civil."

It's election time and emotions are high. But the fine folks on The Hwy should be capable of taking the high road.

I'll leave this topic open only if you guys can keep tempers in check.

Thanks
Little late to the party...... I think NJ handled it all.
 
Back
Top