Paulette

Madea said:
mei lan said:
sadie612 said:
newsjunky said:
Don't know if I caught any supporters campaigning for her on this site other than PCGOPE.
i didn't say it was a site, they campaign other places too..

some people are brow beating others on a friends facebook status too the other night.. it was insane . If I wasn't on my phone I would find it and copy and paste it .. craziness

Some of her (Paulette's) supporters were in my hood today asking people to put up signs. They didn't make it this far back...I think if they had, I'd have said, "Nah, I don't want any for Paulette, but if you have any for Melissa Morrison, I'll take one." HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA

Honestly, I'd never be that rude to Morrison supporters. Although I would decline any request to put her signs in my yard. ;)

Oh, I wouldn't really do it, silly girl. That would be rude, indeed.
 
Unfortunately, some of her signs are missing but other candidate(s) remain. I saw this on Macland in two different spots. :rant
 
PCGOPExaminer said:
Unfortunately, some of her signs are missing but other candidate(s) remain. I saw this on Macland in two different spots. :rant

Honestly, I haven't even seen signs for other candidates in this race.
 
Madea said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
Unfortunately, some of her signs are missing but other candidate(s) remain. I saw this on Macland in two different spots. :rant

Honestly, I haven't even seen signs for other candidates in this race.
They are out there but I only saw one Michael sign today near 92.
 
It is very, very sad to me that Paulette most likely be elected to represent us again..................of course, her being elected again is pretty much by default.
 
Beach Bum said:
It is very, very sad to me that Paulette most likely be elected to represent us again..................of course, her being elected again is pretty much by default.
Sadly, I have to agree with you. Not the choice I wanted to make but it looks like I have little choice.
 
PCGOPExaminer said:
newsjunky said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
Of course one could ask about the failed businesses of the Morrisons rather than bashing someone who has had a business for 25 years that just now failed due to the economy and opened a new one up without a problem.
Why would we do that if we don't allow any bashing?
I am not talking about here at this site, NJ. I am speaking about elsewhere where the playing field is not level and only supported candidates are allowed to bring up issues of their opponents. To me, that is biased with political agendas perpetrated by a liberal and his buddies. So I do see that as unfair and unjust.
I say what is said "over there" should stay "over there" PCGOPE. There is a reason why many of us left that place entirely, and bring that stuff over here isn't serving any useful purpose. May I respectfully suggest that if you want to rebutt comments made on another site, that you do it on that other site, or at least refrain from bringing this place down to their level by repeating what was said or not said "over there". I can absolutely assure you that we don't care what is said on another site, good or bad, about any candidate. We are as a group not drawn into that sort of Junior High atmosphere.
 
Beach Bum said:
It is very, very sad to me that Paulette most likely be elected to represent us again..................of course, her being elected again is pretty much by default.

As I told Madea...I am just not happy with our selection for this race. :(
 
lotstodo said:
I can absolutely assure you that we don't care what is said on another site, good or bad, about any candidate. We are as a group not drawn into that sort of Junior High atmosphere.

+1,000
 
lotstodo said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
newsjunky said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
Of course one could ask about the failed businesses of the Morrisons rather than bashing someone who has had a business for 25 years that just now failed due to the economy and opened a new one up without a problem.
Why would we do that if we don't allow any bashing?
I am not talking about here at this site, NJ. I am speaking about elsewhere where the playing field is not level and only supported candidates are allowed to bring up issues of their opponents. To me, that is biased with political agendas perpetrated by a liberal and his buddies. So I do see that as unfair and unjust.
I say what is said "over there" should stay "over there" PCGOPE. There is a reason why many of us left that place entirely, and bring that stuff over here isn't serving any useful purpose. May I respectfully suggest that if you want to rebutt comments made on another site, that you do it on that other site, or at least refrain from bringing this place down to their level by repeating what was said or not said "over there". I can absolutely assure you that we don't care what is said on another site, good or bad, about any candidate. We are as a group not drawn into that sort of Junior High atmosphere.
Okay chill out..don't get your undies in wad, okay? Geesh....btw, I have no access elsewhere. Liberals don't like competition.
 
I support Paulette fair and square. She did a great job at the Capitol for her first time out for those of us who paid attention on what she was doing and voting on. The first term is always a learning curve as well and she did is right. And yeah, she's my friend but that doesn't matter as she did just fine and will do so in her second term.
 
PCGOPExaminer said:
lotstodo said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
newsjunky said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
Of course one could ask about the failed businesses of the Morrisons rather than bashing someone who has had a business for 25 years that just now failed due to the economy and opened a new one up without a problem.
Why would we do that if we don't allow any bashing?
I am not talking about here at this site, NJ. I am speaking about elsewhere where the playing field is not level and only supported candidates are allowed to bring up issues of their opponents. To me, that is biased with political agendas perpetrated by a liberal and his buddies. So I do see that as unfair and unjust.
I say what is said "over there" should stay "over there" PCGOPE. There is a reason why many of us left that place entirely, and bring that stuff over here isn't serving any useful purpose. May I respectfully suggest that if you want to rebutt comments made on another site, that you do it on that other site, or at least refrain from bringing this place down to their level by repeating what was said or not said "over there". I can absolutely assure you that we don't care what is said on another site, good or bad, about any candidate. We are as a group not drawn into that sort of Junior High atmosphere.
Okay chill out..don't get your undies in wad, okay? Geesh....btw, I have no access elsewhere. Liberals don't like competition.

Do you always have to be so obnoxious when someone reminds you of the rules? It's not our fault you don't have access to some other sites. That's between you and them and has nothing to do with this site. I'll warn you one last time that what goes on at other sites does not get discussed here. Understand?
 
PCGOPExaminer said:
lotstodo said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
newsjunky said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
Of course one could ask about the failed businesses of the Morrisons rather than bashing someone who has had a business for 25 years that just now failed due to the economy and opened a new one up without a problem.
Why would we do that if we don't allow any bashing?
I am not talking about here at this site, NJ. I am speaking about elsewhere where the playing field is not level and only supported candidates are allowed to bring up issues of their opponents. To me, that is biased with political agendas perpetrated by a liberal and his buddies. So I do see that as unfair and unjust.
I say what is said "over there" should stay "over there" PCGOPE. There is a reason why many of us left that place entirely, and bring that stuff over here isn't serving any useful purpose. May I respectfully suggest that if you want to rebutt comments made on another site, that you do it on that other site, or at least refrain from bringing this place down to their level by repeating what was said or not said "over there". I can absolutely assure you that we don't care what is said on another site, good or bad, about any candidate. We are as a group not drawn into that sort of Junior High atmosphere.
Okay chill out..don't get your undies in wad, okay? Geesh....btw, I have no access elsewhere. Liberals don't like competition.
I was being nice. My panties are still well pressed and in place, thank you.. just sayin' that their problems are not our problems.
 
mei lan said:
Beach Bum said:
It is very, very sad to me that Paulette most likely be elected to represent us again..................of course, her being elected again is pretty much by default.

As I told Madea...I am just not happy with our selection for this race. :(

Quite honestly, other than knowing who Morrison's hubby is, I don't know alot about her (except that she says that she's conservative). I know even less about James/Michael/whatever his name is... :dunno
 
I found all I needed to know about Mr. James. His ideas are way out there as far as I am concerned and he never would admit that we live in a Republic and not a Democracy. He used the word progressive in a way that set my radar off.
 
Back
Top