donald trump
- Thread starter mei lan
- Start date
lotstodo
aka "The Jackal"
Those are 2009 numbers, but yes, I'm sure. You can Google to your heart's content. While there are liberal sites pointing out that everyone who works pays payroll taxes, they cannot dispute that number who pay no income tax, which comes directly from the IRS.ShoeDiva date=1443478241 said:Pay zero or make money? 47%? Are we sure about that?stradial date=1443474311 said:(Telling husband we need a new CPA)
ShoeDiva
Shoes!!!!
It is just so high. (I knew you were not wrong, but :confused )Make money or not pay? I wish. We must be doing things all wrong.lotstodo date=1443484618 said:Those are 2009 numbers, but yes, I'm sure. You can Google to your heart's content. While there are liberal sites pointing out that everyone who works pays payroll taxes, they cannot dispute that number who pay no income tax, which comes directly from the IRS.ShoeDiva date=1443478241 said:Pay zero or make money? 47%? Are we sure about that?stradial date=1443474311 said:
)
S
stradial
Guest
lotstodo date=1443484618 said:Those are 2009 numbers, but yes, I'm sure. You can Google to your heart's content. While there are liberal sites pointing out that everyone who works pays payroll taxes, they cannot dispute that number who pay no income tax, which comes directly from the IRS.ShoeDiva date=1443478241 said:Pay zero or make money? 47%? Are we sure about that?stradial date=1443474311 said:
Can you explain how?
Please use small, simple words.
Pretend you are talking to GD's granddaughter, who by my count, is now 3 yrs old.
And already more tech savvy than you are.stradial date=1443487884 said:lotstodo date=1443484618 said:Those are 2009 numbers, but yes, I'm sure. You can Google to your heart's content. While there are liberal sites pointing out that everyone who works pays payroll taxes, they cannot dispute that number who pay no income tax, which comes directly from the IRS.ShoeDiva date=1443478241 said:Pay zero or make money? 47%? Are we sure about that?stradial date=1443474311 said:
Can you explain how?
Please use small, simple words.
Pretend you are talking to GD's granddaughter, who by my count, is now 3 yrs old.
cptlo
Pursuit Driver
Not exactly setting a high bar...Guard Dad date=1443488244 said:And already more tech savvy than you are.stradial date=1443487884 said:lotstodo date=1443484618 said:Those are 2009 numbers, but yes, I'm sure. You can Google to your heart's content. While there are liberal sites pointing out that everyone who works pays payroll taxes, they cannot dispute that number who pay no income tax, which comes directly from the IRS.ShoeDiva date=1443478241 said:Pay zero or make money? 47%? Are we sure about that?stradial date=1443474311 said:
Can you explain how?
Please use small, simple words.
Pretend you are talking to GD's granddaughter, who by my count, is now 3 yrs old.
Well given she isn't even walking yet...cptlo306 date=1443488405 said:Not exactly setting a high bar...Guard Dad date=1443488244 said:And already more tech savvy than you are.stradial date=1443487884 said:lotstodo date=1443484618 said:Those are 2009 numbers, but yes, I'm sure. You can Google to your heart's content. While there are liberal sites pointing out that everyone who works pays payroll taxes, they cannot dispute that number who pay no income tax, which comes directly from the IRS.ShoeDiva date=1443478241 said:Pay zero or make money? 47%? Are we sure about that?stradial date=1443474311 said:
Can you explain how?
Please use small, simple words.
Pretend you are talking to GD's granddaughter, who by my count, is now 3 yrs old.
S
stradial
Guest
Guard Dad date=1443488244 said:And already more tech savvy than you are.stradial date=1443487884 said:lotstodo date=1443484618 said:Those are 2009 numbers, but yes, I'm sure. You can Google to your heart's content. While there are liberal sites pointing out that everyone who works pays payroll taxes, they cannot dispute that number who pay no income tax, which comes directly from the IRS.ShoeDiva date=1443478241 said:Pay zero or make money? 47%? Are we sure about that?stradial date=1443474311 said:
Can you explain how?
Please use small, simple words.
Pretend you are talking to GD's granddaughter, who by my count, is now 3 yrs old.
That's really not saying a lot.
But perhaps LTD can explain it to her and she can explain it to me.
I do speak blocks.
cptlo
Pursuit Driver
Trump and Fiorina in one word....
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/poll-asked-voters-describe-donald-173847819.html
Trump:
9.8% — "Idiot/Jerk/Stupid/Dumb"
6.0% — "Arrogant"
5.6% — "Crazy/Nuts"
4.7% — "Buffoon/Clown/Comical/Joke"
4.3% — "Unfavorable/Dislike him"
4.1% — "Egotistical/Narcissist/Selfish"
3.8% — "Bombastic/Showoff/Pompous"
3.1% — "Outspoken/Frank/Opinionated"
2.9% — "Entertaining/Entertainer"
2.7% — "Businessman/Successful"
2.7% — "Honest/Trustworthy/Truthful"
2.7% — "Cunning/Untrustworthy/Dishonest"
2.6% — "Blow hard/Boisterous"
2.6% — "Favorable/Like him"
1.8% — "Exhilarating/Exciting/Ballsy"
1.7% — "Aggressive"
1.5% — "Blunt/Brash"
1.4% — "Big mouth/Mouthy"
1.3% — "Unqualified/Incompetent"
1.2% — "Bully"
1.2% — "Disgusting/Despicable/Horrible"
1.1% — "Bigot/Racist"
1.1% — "Intelligent"
1.1% — "Rich"
1.0% — "Bold/Brave"
0.9% — "Obnoxious"
0.9% — "Ridiculous"
0.8% — "Different"
0.8% — "Competent/Capable/Intelligent"
0.7% — "Rude"
0.7% — "Leader"
0.6% — "Confident"
0.5% — "Scary"
0.4% — "Ignorant"
11.2% — Other
10.5% — Don't know/refused
Fiorina:
10.2% — "Smart/Intelligent/Knowledgeable"
5.6% — "Dishonest/Liar/Untrustworthy"
5.1% — "Strong/Tough"
4.6% — "Favorable/Okay/Like"
3.8% — "Idiot/Evil/Joke/Cold"
3.1% — "Unfavorable/Dislike"
2.9% — "Businesswoman/HP/CEO/Professional"
2.7% — "Determined/Enthusiastic/Go-getter"
2.1% — "Honest/Trustworthy"
1.7% — "Uninformed/Clueless"
1.7% — "Outspoken/Assertive/Direct"
1.6% — "Capable/Competent"
1.4% — "Aggressive"
1.4% — "Inexperienced"
1.1% — "Ambitious"
1.1% — "Caring/Thoughtful/Fair"
1.0% — "Nice/Sincere"
0.9% — "Republican
0.9% — "Leader"
0.9% — "Interesting"
0.8% — "Failure"
0.8% — "Unqualified"
0.7% — "Incompetent"
0.7% — "Questionable"
0.6% — "Female/Woman"
0.4% — "Impressive"
0.3% — "Dependable"
4.6% — Other
37.3% — Don't know/refused
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/poll-asked-voters-describe-donald-173847819.html
Trump:
9.8% — "Idiot/Jerk/Stupid/Dumb"
6.0% — "Arrogant"
5.6% — "Crazy/Nuts"
4.7% — "Buffoon/Clown/Comical/Joke"
4.3% — "Unfavorable/Dislike him"
4.1% — "Egotistical/Narcissist/Selfish"
3.8% — "Bombastic/Showoff/Pompous"
3.1% — "Outspoken/Frank/Opinionated"
2.9% — "Entertaining/Entertainer"
2.7% — "Businessman/Successful"
2.7% — "Honest/Trustworthy/Truthful"
2.7% — "Cunning/Untrustworthy/Dishonest"
2.6% — "Blow hard/Boisterous"
2.6% — "Favorable/Like him"
1.8% — "Exhilarating/Exciting/Ballsy"
1.7% — "Aggressive"
1.5% — "Blunt/Brash"
1.4% — "Big mouth/Mouthy"
1.3% — "Unqualified/Incompetent"
1.2% — "Bully"
1.2% — "Disgusting/Despicable/Horrible"
1.1% — "Bigot/Racist"
1.1% — "Intelligent"
1.1% — "Rich"
1.0% — "Bold/Brave"
0.9% — "Obnoxious"
0.9% — "Ridiculous"
0.8% — "Different"
0.8% — "Competent/Capable/Intelligent"
0.7% — "Rude"
0.7% — "Leader"
0.6% — "Confident"
0.5% — "Scary"
0.4% — "Ignorant"
11.2% — Other
10.5% — Don't know/refused
Fiorina:
10.2% — "Smart/Intelligent/Knowledgeable"
5.6% — "Dishonest/Liar/Untrustworthy"
5.1% — "Strong/Tough"
4.6% — "Favorable/Okay/Like"
3.8% — "Idiot/Evil/Joke/Cold"
3.1% — "Unfavorable/Dislike"
2.9% — "Businesswoman/HP/CEO/Professional"
2.7% — "Determined/Enthusiastic/Go-getter"
2.1% — "Honest/Trustworthy"
1.7% — "Uninformed/Clueless"
1.7% — "Outspoken/Assertive/Direct"
1.6% — "Capable/Competent"
1.4% — "Aggressive"
1.4% — "Inexperienced"
1.1% — "Ambitious"
1.1% — "Caring/Thoughtful/Fair"
1.0% — "Nice/Sincere"
0.9% — "Republican
0.9% — "Leader"
0.9% — "Interesting"
0.8% — "Failure"
0.8% — "Unqualified"
0.7% — "Incompetent"
0.7% — "Questionable"
0.6% — "Female/Woman"
0.4% — "Impressive"
0.3% — "Dependable"
4.6% — Other
37.3% — Don't know/refused
honeybunny
Pursuit Driver
Mark these words... if Trump was smart he would embrace Carson into the fold.
Two non establishment birds... of very different and controversial feathers.
From a pure strategy standpoint, this would be a genius move.
8)
Two non establishment birds... of very different and controversial feathers.
From a pure strategy standpoint, this would be a genius move.
8)
mei lan
Pursuit Driver
Thank you. As I keep saying...I'm not voting for a BFF or pastor...I'm voting for someone with the cajones and street smarts to pull this country back from the brink, if that can even be done. I'll worry about nit-picky conservative bona fides when we're on more stable footing.
He may have an arseclown personality but the man is successful, and by successful I mean he has far more successes than failures. Anyone who argues against that statement is either not being objective or is misguided. It's hard to claim success without first attempting to accomplish something other than finishing reading a textbook. Give me a man (or woman) who has succeeded in life over a person with only honorary accolades any day.