I haven't been following this that closely. Did Pfizer ever specifically say their vaccine would prevent transmission, or was it just everyone else in power saying it?
Good question, I don't recall hearing that much about it preventing transmission, only that the vaccines were like 94% effective against infection. But, that turned out to be false as well. My understanding is that the mRNA vaccines really don't prevent people from getting it so much as they primed the immune system to rapidly attack and kill the virus once it is detected within the body. And that was for the original strain of COVID.
I'm not a medical scientist, but I would think that there's a strong connection between having the virus and being able to transmit the virus. Meaning, if you don't have it, can you transmit it? I would think not.
Perhaps the larger question is...if the vaccines didn't prevent transmission, then what was the rational behind the mandates?
From what I understand, Fauci and Biden both stated that vaccinated people can't spread COVID, and we now know that to be false. And the mandates really didn't start until the vaccine's effectiveness dropped because of the variants.
This whole mess has been a massive disinformation campaign, much of it coming from people we're supposed to be able to trust. Fauci originally stated that the pandemic would be over when we reached herd immunity, and that was a correct statement. I believe that is where we're at now. And remember...he said this well before we had vaccines, so he was referring to immunity from prior infection.
But then, the vaccines came out and natural immunity was first said to only last 30-90 days (depending on who you listen to), and then Fauci and the CDC basically said natural immunity didn't exist. All while credible reports were coming out of other countries that natural immunity was "robust and durable" (the terminology they always used), and that natural immunity was fairing better against infection that the vaccines. When asked about those reports, Fauci and Walenski would dodge the question and claim they didn't have any data to support those claims. Which was BS, BTW. Some of those reports were peer reviewed and turned out to be spot on!
I think it's extremely obvious that money drove the narrative, and I am not OK with that. And money and power suppressed a lot of correct information that a "free" people should have had access to.
And though I do think the vaccines bought us some time, nature is winning the war. Especially since the virus has mutated as it has, I think natural immunity has played a far bigger roll in ending the pandemic than the vaccines have.