You choose to travel overseas, you have the option. You choose to join the military, you have the option. You choose to send your kids to public school, you have the option (if it's affordable).
Let me pose this question. What's the difference in mandating a jab and mandating no guns (and don't say Constitutional Amendments because obviously those aren't being honored). Would people accept turning in their guns if the goobermint said it was necessary to protect society? I think not.
Whether people admit it or not the jab issue has "mutated" into a political power grab (see what I did there). It was never about "2 weeks" but rather the first bold step towards socialism. Don't believe me, take a look at where a large percentage of our younger generations are in regards to their acceptance of socialistic policies.
Let me pose this question. What's the difference in mandating a jab and mandating no guns (and don't say Constitutional Amendments because obviously those aren't being honored). Would people accept turning in their guns if the goobermint said it was necessary to protect society? I think not.
Whether people admit it or not the jab issue has "mutated" into a political power grab (see what I did there). It was never about "2 weeks" but rather the first bold step towards socialism. Don't believe me, take a look at where a large percentage of our younger generations are in regards to their acceptance of socialistic policies.
Last edited: