Tonight\'s Candidate Forum

newsjunky said:
Winchester said:
I run across this and thought the website name was funny.

http://billcorrupt.com/
I think it is rather low. I am wondering who is really putting out all of the robo calls too. Funny they are all misquotes or not quite accurate. I think if a candidate is doing that and he/she is smart they make sure the calls are going to have the effect they want. Why do the ones I am getting set my radar off?
I am not sure who did that site either but hey, its politics. Some did it to Paulette 2 years ago and then did it to Jerry. As far as the Robocalls, I am not sure either.
 
PCGOPExaminer said:
LisaC said:
I wasn't able to make it - I'm working late all week. Did anyone ask Paulette to address the status of litigation against her (and did she respond or just ignore the question)?
No questions were asked about her issues which are just that, her issues with her business/company and she isn't the first and won't be the last, especially in this Obama economy. When Mike went off on a jerk rage, the audience was not amused as the reaction was unreal. Paulette stood professionally and took it all and went about the business of the debate. Mike knew he screwed up and it showed.

That is not accurate. The litigation issues also pertains to Paulette personally as she signed a personal guaranty. As for the federal tax lien, that is attached to HER social security number.

I truly don't understand how so many people can simply look over the many, many issues that Paulette has. The arrest record, the $800,000.00 plus thousand dollar judgment, the $36,000.00 Federal Tax Lien, the CONTEMPT action, etc., etc., etc. If I were a betting person, I would bet that the $36,000.00 federal tax lien is not the end - that is simply for tax years 2006 and 2007. Wonder whats going on with 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011?

The federal tax lien alone is what is keeping me from voting for her - us tax paying citizens are the ones who pay for those like Paulette that don't pay their taxes. How dare she try to pretend to "know what is best for me and my family" when she can't tend to herself and her own issues.

Paulette has not introduced any significant legislation and while I agree that she has voted the right way, I want a Representative that can do way more than "vote the right way." I want someone who can devote their time to the needs of our community instead of being preoccupied with tending to her multiple legal issues. I truly don't understand how she can effectively represent us with the multitude of issues she has going on. My opinion - tend to those things as they are very important and then seek political gain after these VERY SERIOUS issues are taken care of.

You know, I can overlook a lof of things but when you start looking at the "big picture" with Paulettte and taking into consideration ALL the issues, it is simply just too much. I'm not trying to be controversial Chris as you know I think the world of you and some other Paulette supporters here. I just simply don't understand. What I do understand however is that Paulette will be re-elected this time; however; I for one AM NOT proud of this - not only for mysef and my family, but for my community.
 
None of the three candidates we have to choose from are worthy of my vote. This is really a disappointing selection. I didn't even vote for her in the general as I did a write-in for that race.
 
PCGOPExaminer said:
LisaC said:
Madea said:
LisaC said:
I wasn't able to make it - I'm working late all week. Did anyone ask Paulette to address the status of litigation against her (and did she respond or just ignore the question)?

No, no one asked her. Mr. James mentioned it during his opening remarks. The questions were not personal in nature. that's not how the forum was structured.

I just read what was put on the other site about the litigation - that information is accurate. Paulette is currently in a position where if she doesn't pay as she was ordered, the judge could order her to jail. (Her former attorney has paid his portion of the contempt, it's just up to the Braddocks to pay what they owe).

I have to say that I'm astounded that neither Paulette nor Carruth seem to take federal litigation very seriously. If they're so willing to ignore the Courts, are they really listening to us?
Stop reading from the useless liberal dribble. Some of those people absolutely hate her and they do it for personal gain and agendas. I know most of what is going on with her business issues. Those morons know nothing but hearsay.

Actually, that "useless liberal dribble" was reporting the facts. The litigation is not hearsay and I have access to the court documents to be able to confirm that information. It is a fact that Paulette is currently in contempt of court for not paying attorney's fees that the Judge ordered her to pay. It is a fact that Carruth basically ignored a lawsuit and he has a judgment against him because he did not respond (and there is clear evidence on the record to show that he had knowledge of the lawsuit).

I know this sounds naive, but integrity is still important to me. I work for a law firm and have a great respect for our legal system (even with its faults) and it speaks volumes to me when I see the people we elect either ignore or abuse that process.
 
LisaC said:
PCGOPExaminer said:
LisaC said:
Madea said:
LisaC said:
I wasn't able to make it - I'm working late all week. Did anyone ask Paulette to address the status of litigation against her (and did she respond or just ignore the question)?

No, no one asked her. Mr. James mentioned it during his opening remarks. The questions were not personal in nature. that's not how the forum was structured.

I just read what was put on the other site about the litigation - that information is accurate. Paulette is currently in a position where if she doesn't pay as she was ordered, the judge could order her to jail. (Her former attorney has paid his portion of the contempt, it's just up to the Braddocks to pay what they owe).

I have to say that I'm astounded that neither Paulette nor Carruth seem to take federal litigation very seriously. If they're so willing to ignore the Courts, are they really listening to us?
Stop reading from the useless liberal dribble. Some of those people absolutely hate her and they do it for personal gain and agendas. I know most of what is going on with her business issues. Those morons know nothing but hearsay.

Actually, that "useless liberal dribble" was reporting the facts. The litigation is not hearsay and I have access to the court documents to be able to confirm that information. It is a fact that Paulette is currently in contempt of court for not paying attorney's fees that the Judge ordered her to pay. It is a fact that Carruth basically ignored a lawsuit and he has a judgment against him because he did not respond (and there is clear evidence on the record to show that he had knowledge of the lawsuit).

I know this sounds naive, but integrity is still important to me. I work for a law firm and have a great respect for our legal system (even with its faults) and it speaks volumes to me when I see the people we elect either ignore or abuse that process.
Think she has a hearing on July 2nd or 3rd on this issue. Hope she can resolve it.
 
LisaC said:
I know this sounds naive, but integrity is still important to me. I work for a law firm and have a great respect for our legal system (even with its faults) and it speaks volumes to me when I see the people we elect either ignore or abuse that process.

I completely agree.

However, after taking into account ALL the factors in this particular race, I know I can't possibly vote for Morrison (because I seriously doubt her motivation and I don't believe her values align with mine) and James would be an absolute stretch for many reasons. While I differ with Braddock on many areas, I do believe that her votes will continue toward the conservative side.
 
Madea said:
LisaC said:
I know this sounds naive, but integrity is still important to me. I work for a law firm and have a great respect for our legal system (even with its faults) and it speaks volumes to me when I see the people we elect either ignore or abuse that process.

I completely agree.

However, after taking into account ALL the factors in this particular race, I know I can't possibly vote for Morrison (because I seriously doubt her motivation and I don't believe her values align with mine) and James would be an absolute stretch for many reasons. While I differ with Braddock on many areas, I do believe that her votes will continue toward the conservative side.
:thumbsup
 
Madea said:
LisaC said:
I know this sounds naive, but integrity is still important to me. I work for a law firm and have a great respect for our legal system (even with its faults) and it speaks volumes to me when I see the people we elect either ignore or abuse that process.

I completely agree.

However, after taking into account ALL the factors in this particular race, I know I can't possibly vote for Morrison (because I seriously doubt her motivation and I don't believe her values align with mine) and James would be an absolute stretch for many reasons. While I differ with Braddock on many areas, I do believe that her votes will continue toward the conservative side.

I honestly don't know how I'm voting in this race. :dunno
 
My mother always taught me to never say anything if you did not have anything good to say about them.

.....


Can we get a whole new slate of candidates to choose from?
 
Madea said:
LisaC said:
I know this sounds naive, but integrity is still important to me. I work for a law firm and have a great respect for our legal system (even with its faults) and it speaks volumes to me when I see the people we elect either ignore or abuse that process.

I completely agree.

However, after taking into account ALL the factors in this particular race, I know I can't possibly vote for Morrison (because I seriously doubt her motivation and I don't believe her values align with mine) and James would be an absolute stretch for many reasons. While I differ with Braddock on many areas, I do believe that her votes will continue toward the conservative side.

^^^ What she said.
 
Winchester said:
My mother always taught me to never say anything if you did not have anything good to say about them.

.....


Can we get a whole new slate of candidates to choose from?
Would be a good thing if we could but we have the folks that we have and we have to choose to vote for one or none.
 
newsjunky said:
Madea said:
Someone spent a LOT of money to have this show up in facebook feed.

http://www.truthaboutbillcarruth.com/

Same website, new name.

If I knew how to post a picture here from my phone, I'd show you. :laugh
You can say anything about anyone and how is a voter to know the difference.

What I saw on the site is that each accusation has supporting documation. Oh I have a very good idea who did the site. But you can always check to see who the domain name is registered to.
 
Winchester said:
newsjunky said:
Madea said:
Someone spent a LOT of money to have this show up in facebook feed.

http://www.truthaboutbillcarruth.com/

Same website, new name.

If I knew how to post a picture here from my phone, I'd show you. :laugh
You can say anything about anyone and how is a voter to know the difference.

What I saw on the site is that each accusation has supporting documation. Oh I have a very good idea who did the site. But you can always check to see who the domain name is registered to.

And the info is hidden by a proxy server.



Registrant:
Domains By Proxy, LLC
DomainsByProxy.com
14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: TRUTHABOUTBILLCARRUTH.COM
Created on: 28-Jun-12
Expires on: 28-Jun-13
Last Updated on: 28-Jun-12

Administrative Contact:
Private, Registration TRUTHABOUTBILLCARRUTH.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains By Proxy, LLC
DomainsByProxy.com
14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598

Technical Contact:
Private, Registration TRUTHABOUTBILLCARRUTH.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Domains By Proxy, LLC
DomainsByProxy.com
14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
United States
(480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598

Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.WEBCONTROLCENTER.COM
NS2.WEBCONTROLCENTER.COM
 
Back
Top