Tonight\'s Candidate Forum
- Thread starter Madea
- Start date
Madea
zip a dee doo dah
He went on a rant in his opening remarks. He actually called for her resignation and removal from the race.
However, later in the debate, he dropped it all completely and ended up agreeing with most of what she's done under the Gold Dome. Paulette did not address any of his comments.
However, later in the debate, he dropped it all completely and ended up agreeing with most of what she's done under the Gold Dome. Paulette did not address any of his comments.
F
Foxmeister
Guest
Madea said:
Makes me suspect he may be a member of prom if he wanted to rehash all that stuff. It certainly demonstrated he lacks class.
If both he and Morrison agreed with most of what Paulette has done at the House, it certainly comes across as they have endorsed her accomplishments. Perhaps she should put in her campaign literature "During a candidate's forum at the Dallas Theater, both my opponents endorsed my accomplishments in the State House." :laugh
Endorsed her accomplishments or are afraid to say they don't? That is the question. Her record is not that bad. I disagreed with some parts of the new tax Bill and she stood in support of it. It is not enough to call her record into question from where I stand.Foxmeister said:
LisaC
I'm here to spin the moral compass.
Madea said:
I just read what was put on the other site about the litigation - that information is accurate. Paulette is currently in a position where if she doesn't pay as she was ordered, the judge could order her to jail. (Her former attorney has paid his portion of the contempt, it's just up to the Braddocks to pay what they owe).
I have to say that I'm astounded that neither Paulette nor Carruth seem to take federal litigation very seriously. If they're so willing to ignore the Courts, are they really listening to us?
Winchester
When you need FIREPOWER!
I think it is rather low. I am wondering who is really putting out all of the robo calls too. Funny they are all misquotes or not quite accurate. I think if a candidate is doing that and he/she is smart they make sure the calls are going to have the effect they want. Why do the ones I am getting set my radar off?Winchester said:
PCGOPExaminer
Expert Driver
My opinion...Paulette won hands down. Michael became a jerk after he went hell-bent on Paulette, which was DUMB!!!!!!!...and then practically agreed with her on all of her responses. Go figure on that one.
Melissa, well she seems nice but was a bit lost on many of the questions and felt like she just went along for the ride. So if I had to chose (which I can't vote in the 19th district anyway)....1, 2, 3.....it would be Paulette, then Melissa and then Michael.
Paulette did a very good job her first 2 years no matter what anyone says.
Melissa, well she seems nice but was a bit lost on many of the questions and felt like she just went along for the ride. So if I had to chose (which I can't vote in the 19th district anyway)....1, 2, 3.....it would be Paulette, then Melissa and then Michael.
Paulette did a very good job her first 2 years no matter what anyone says.
PCGOPExaminer
Expert Driver
No questions were asked about her issues which are just that, her issues with her business/company and she isn't the first and won't be the last, especially in this Obama economy. When Mike went off on a jerk rage, the audience was not amused as the reaction was unreal. Paulette stood professionally and took it all and went about the business of the debate. Mike knew he screwed up and it showed.LisaC said:
PCGOPExaminer
Expert Driver
Stop reading from the useless liberal dribble. Some of those people absolutely hate her and they do it for personal gain and agendas. I know most of what is going on with her business issues. Those morons know nothing but hearsay.LisaC said: