I'd prefer neither. In my opinion DS is still the best choice but I have heard rumors that his choice is a woman (and not the hot one, MTG, or KL).Agreed. He seems too shady to me.
Trump's team has already ruled him out as VP (granted, that could change). They wouldn't answer yes or no when asked if Haley is a possible VP pick which means that she is a possibility.
Does anyone still watch her trash or her nerwork’s trash?No matter what you think of Trump, his win last night is legit news. And MSNBC's refusal to air his speech is contradictory to journalistic principles. This is the kind of crap that is keeping our people stupid.
Rachel Maddow defends MSNBC's refusal to air Trump's Iowa victory speech: ‘Not out of spite’
Rachel Maddow defends MSNBC's refusal to air Trump's Iowa victory speech: ‘Not out of spite’
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow said the network was forced to censor former President Trump's victory speech in Iowa because it couldn't air lies.www.foxnews.com
Please not MTG. Please.I'd prefer neither. In my opinion DS is still the best choice but I have heard rumors that his choice is a woman (and not the hot one, MTG, or KL).
Those diehard Trumpers will think that's a great ticket. Seriously.Please not MTG. Please.
This is Trump’s rumored likely VP pick that I’m going with for the moment even though I can’t see how it would help him too much in the General:Please not MTG. Please.
Does anyone still watch any msm?Does anyone still watch her trash or her nerwork’s trash?
Voting for someone other than a candidate from the two major parties is not the same as staying home. People should vote for who they feel best represents them. If they voted for someone who has neither a D nor an R after their name, they did their civic duty; they exercised their right to vote and they should not be looked down upon.About who I will vote for in the primary
I have been truthful all along when I stated I had not decided. I flirted with the possibility of Haley because it looked for awhile that she was the most electable. She seems to be souring somewhat in that respect, and she's said some things I can't support. So she is likely out.
On issues alone, my beliefs aligned most closely with DeSantis. Even though I think his positions were a liability for him in some areas, I agreed with almost all of them.
For the last 3-4 weeks, I have probably been pretty evenly split between Trump and DeSantis. Frankly, I wanted to vote for him if I could convince myself it was a pragmatic thing to do.
But this question has been answered now, with DeSantis dropping out. Unless there's a knockout punch between now and our primary, I will vote for Trump.
Also, as much as I would love to have a viable 3rd party, it does not exist a this time. And no, I'm not going to debate that ad nauseam with some of you, voting for a candidate who cannot win is no different from staying home on election day. The net effect is exactly the same because there is no net effect. The next president will be either the Democrat or Republican nominee.
I'm not questioning civic duty, I'm questioning the real effect of that vote.Voting for someone other than a candidate from the two major parties is not the same as staying home. People should vote for who they feel best represents them. If they voted for someone who has neither a D nor an R after their name, they did their civic duty; they exercised their right to vote and they should not be looked down upon.
The first went and voted. The other stayed home. If you vote for Trump and he loses, is that comparable to having stayed at home?I'm not questioning civic duty, I'm questioning the real effect of that vote.
Please explain the difference in voting for a non-viable candidate vs staying at home, from a perspective of their real effects on the election.
. The end result of both are exactly the same. Neither viable candidate gets that vote, so it has zero effect