F
Foxmeister
Guest
Sometimes parents don't find out their children did something wrong until days after the offense occurred. I'm sure there are instances where the parents didn't know anything about it even longer than that. Should a lapse in time from the occurrence of the event to when the parents find out make any difference in whether or not punishment should be doled out? I don't think so.
When my children were small punishment usually took place immediately. While they were in middle school or high school, if they did something wrong it depended on the offense on how long it would take for us to decide on the appropriate punishment for them. When the punishment was decided, they would be sat down and it was discussed with them what they did was wrong and then given the punishment. Sometimes the offense a child commits can really anger parents because of its severity. Wouldn't it be better to decide on the punishment after the parents had cooled down and could think of a punishment rationally rather than mostly based upon emotion?
I don't find anything insane in that process at all.
When my children were small punishment usually took place immediately. While they were in middle school or high school, if they did something wrong it depended on the offense on how long it would take for us to decide on the appropriate punishment for them. When the punishment was decided, they would be sat down and it was discussed with them what they did was wrong and then given the punishment. Sometimes the offense a child commits can really anger parents because of its severity. Wouldn't it be better to decide on the punishment after the parents had cooled down and could think of a punishment rationally rather than mostly based upon emotion?
I don't find anything insane in that process at all.