Yep...
Waiting 36 years to say maybe, you were possibly, almost, raped is interesting ... or a lie.
This gives politicians that want a way to back out of voting to confirm Kavanaugh, the ideal excuse... why else did the dems wait until this week to break a false allegation so the vote would not pass.
What was that?... innocent until proven guilty. Nope ... stained by false allegations - works every time.
Dems have been doing this for decades. Does not have to be true, the man can't prove it did not happen... can't prove a negative.
It gives the liberals a way to say they can no longer vote for that person.
Several red state Democrats facing tight re-election races, who have been considered potential Kavanaugh votes, said Monday that they want the allegations thoroughly investigated.
Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota said in a statement posted on Twitter Monday that Ford's allegation is "serious."
"Ford should be given an opportunity to testify before the Committee and she is willing to do so. Judge Kavanaugh has also expressed his willingness to discuss the issue with the Committee," Heitkamp said. "It takes courage for any woman to speak up about sexual assault, and we need to respect Prof. Ford by listening to her and hearing her story."
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., echoed Heitkamp. “I am deeply troubled by these allegations," she said in a brief statement. "They should be examined thoroughly and fairly by the Judiciary Committee without any artificial timeline.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...-judiciary-committee-response-assault-n910206