Trump: Grab them [women] by the p....

cptlo306 said:
Do you think this will help Trump get more of the female vote?
Click to expand...
Back when the womanizing stuff was coming out on Slick Willie, his popularity went up almost every time. Rush called it the "Arousal Factor". :rofl:

Having said...I don't think Trump has Billy Clinton's charm and charisma. Just money.
 
Winchester said:
He wasn't even in politics back then. It's a lot to do about nothing! Lord knows I've heard worse in the squad room from a bunch of cops, many were female talking crap! Those who had their feeling hurt over this need to get over it, falls right into the "Left's" plan to wimpify this Country, right along with man buns and other liberal crap!
Click to expand...

So, do you think the video will help Trump get more of the female vote?
 
Ten years ago, at the 1988 Republican Convention, Hartford Courant associate editor David Fink
struck up a conversation with George W. "When you’re not talking politics," Fink asked the vice
president’s son, "what do you and [your father] talk about?"

"Pussy," George W. replied.

:eek:
 
honeybunny said:
Ten years ago, at the 1988 Republican Convention, Hartford Courant associate editor David Fink
struck up a conversation with George W. "When you’re not talking politics," Fink asked the vice
president’s son, "what do you and [your father] talk about?"

"Pussy," George W. replied.

:eek:
Click to expand...

How is that relevant to what Trump said? If you really think it is then you are totally missing the point.
 
Trumped Up : Selective Outrage

http://www.city-journal.org/html/trumped-outrage-14777.html

"The reaction to Trump’s comments stems in part from identity politics,
the focus of the Clinton campaign and something the elite Right has largely
bought into. Trump, a heterosexual white male, spoke like a (churlish)
heterosexual (white) male at the expense of women, and this must spark
intense and righteous indignation because women are a permanent—
and large—element of the victim class."

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/10/moral-outrage-donald-trumps-lewd-comments-misplaced/


:nono:
 
honeybunny said:
Trumped Up : Selective Outrage

http://www.city-journal.org/html/trumped-outrage-14777.html

"The reaction to Trump’s comments stems in part from identity politics,
the focus of the Clinton campaign and something the elite Right has largely
bought into. Trump, a heterosexual white male, spoke like a (churlish)
heterosexual (white) male at the expense of women, and this must spark
intense and righteous indignation because women are a permanent—
and large—element of the victim class."

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/10/moral-outrage-donald-trumps-lewd-comments-misplaced/


:nono:
Click to expand...
From your first article: Females would never ever exploit their sexuality to seek attention from men. Bush and Trump, driving to the set of Days of Our Lives on a studio bus, comment on the legs of actress Arianne Zucker who is coming to meet them: “Oh, nice legs, huh?” Trump says. “Your girl’s hot as sh*t, in the purple,” Bush says. How surprising that Trump and Bush noticed Zucker’s legs! As documented in the video, she is wearing a skimpy purple dress, with an extremely short hem cut on the bias, a low neckline and fully exposed back. She is in high heels to accentuate her bare legs. The ratio of exposed skin between Zucker, on the one hand, and Trump and Bush, on the other, is perhaps 100 to one. But all that bare flesh must simply be because Zucker has a high metabolism and gets exceedingly warm; she would never want to broadcast her sexuality to men or have men notice her. The fact that she swishes her hips when she walks must just be a quirk of anatomy.

SERIOUSLY?


That Federalist opinion is stupid. Abortion? Then back to Clinton. SMH People can be ticked, mad, outraged over all three things, though abortion and Kaine and Clinton and her million issues have nothing to do with what Trump said. Telling people that their outrage is misplaced because there are more important things to be outraged over?

Neither of these articles help the case of Trump and people being mad. In reality that first article makes me madder than heck at the woman that has written that garbage.
 
I'm still trying to determine exactly which is worse...and it's still a toss-up (not just the actual action but the irony of the acceptance)

Trump TALKING about grabbing women by the...well, you know the part...

OR

An instrument ACTUALLY BEING USED in the same...well, you know the part...to terminate...yes kill...an unwanted child


(hmmmm, tough one here)
 
J-man said:
I'm still trying to determine exactly which is worse...and it's still a toss-up (not just the actual action but the irony of the acceptance)

Trump TALKING about grabbing women by the...well, you know the part...

OR

An instrument ACTUALLY BEING USED in the same...well, you know the part...to terminate...yes kill...an unwanted child


(hmmmm, tough one here)
Click to expand...
How are they comparable? What does one have to do with the other? You do understand you can hate/be outraged, sick, despise (you get my drift) both?
 
ShoeDiva said:
How are they comparable? What does one have to do with the other? You do understand you can hate/be outraged, sick, despise (you get my drift) both?
Click to expand...
Sure I do, I was just comparing the two in an attempt to decide which was worse. I mean they're neck and neck right?
 
ShoeDiva said:
Are you drinking?
Click to expand...
Coffee...(black and strong), milk (2%), and.....water (tap...not bottled).

Oh, I almost forgot...and an occasional swallow of tobacco juice. Accidentally of course....trust me when I say, "That'll wake you up."
 
J-man said:
Coffee...(black and strong), milk (2%), and.....water (tap...not bottled).
Click to expand...
Milk waters down coffee too much. If I want white coffee instead of black I use a little heavy cream. I tried half and half and it still tastes like it waters down the coffee. I like very dark coffee. :coffeebath:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top