Paulette endorsement announced by well-known physician

[naturegirl]

I never saw any so called rule about posting any text under the articles that I write.

I also don't write for free and a part of me making money is by link clicks.

Again, I write those articles. So what some of you are saying is for me to post the entire article because you want to know whether you want to read it or not or because your phones don't do well on the site?

I am not sure what to do about the phone issues but I don't post all of my articles and not get paid. Most of my articles it takes an hour or more to write up and publish.

I write GOP politics because I enjoy it and enjoy politics. But I also do it for the money as nothing is free and I work hard at getting what information I can get out to everyone.

I mean, I already stated what the article is about. Ugh...never mind. :dunno

No one is asking you to post your entire article. Just give us enough to want to open it. Some people can't go to links from their phones so posting a snippet peaks their interest. When they get home then they can actually open the link because they want to read more.

Just posting a link without any text is basically spamming. I know you're not a spammer Chris.

 

[Foxmeister]

Dr John has been around this County a very long time, but is no longer practicing medicine. I have gotten to know him pretty good by attending Commissioner meetings and other County events. He is a great fellow and very easy to talk to.

But I have also met Paulette a few times and how she got elected is beyond me! Another politician with the personality of a dead fish. Very cold to anyone that cannot help her or has lots of money. She will not get my vote either.

I know Paulette as she is my friend. There is zero wrong with her personality, she is actually pretty smart. People hate her for whatever the reason is, which personally I could careless...but she is not dumb nor cold to anyone. She also did exactly everything she said she would do in the past 2 years in the House. I also could bring up something that I know about one of her challengers but I won't. If you knew Paulette, you'd understand but you don't...only hearsay. And yes, I know about her financial issues related to her business and of what she is doing about it to resolve it. But hey, no one cares about that other than bash her by listening to third party jerks who have an agenda and will do whatever they can to hurt her in any way possible or flat out lie.

And speaking of lies...Mason is way off base and is lying about Heath wanting to end the Hope Scholarship. That is completely false.

I'll agree that a lot of people are making assumptions about why she hasn't paid her taxes and Xerox. It could very well be she had a lot of uncollected receivables because a lot of her customers were not paying on time. It very well could have come down to making a decision on "Do I pay my employees for their work or do I pay the taxes?" I would have to say in a situation like this, you pay your employees first and try to make some arrangements about he taxes. A lot of people are concluding her business was thriving and everyone was paying her business on time, but she just decided to not pay her bills because she wants to take expensive vacations and own expensive things.

I have no idea how aggressively she's been working with the state and feds to resolve the tax issues, but you would think being a member of the state house and wanting to continue in that role, she's working aggressively to resolve them.

The truth of the matter is, if these problems are not resolved by the time of her hearing, she will most likely have her name removed from the ballot. For us in 19, that is not good at all as that leaves us with two very suspect candidates to choose from.

The problems she's facing today are much worse than the insurance and divorce issues that were brought up during her last campaign as these problems will most likely get her removed from the ballot.

What is very disappointing about this whole thing is, she knew these problems were serious. She didn't think very far ahead nor was she very concerned with the people of her district or the GOP as she should have been in this matter. She knew whether or not she had the financial means to clear this up before the deadline for filing candidacy. It does appear to me she was hoping this mess would remain hidden so her candidacy would not be challenged.

Because it's obvious she does not have the financial means to resolve these issues with the IRS, state, and Xerox; she should have announced she was not seeking re-election for personal reasons. This would have allowed someone who would be willing to represent the 19th that is more qualified than the other two candidates we now have to chose from.

I'm sorry Chris, but it does appear to me that Paulette was thinking more about keeping her seat in the House than the people of the 19th and the GOP.

Now it looks like one of the other two is going to be our next rep and they will give the GOP a black eye because they are indeed running as RINOs to get elected.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

<snip>
I mean, I already stated what the article is about. Ugh...never mind. :dunno

No. You did not give complete info. I call you out on that one.

All you needed to include was the Doctors name...then people could decide if they wanted to read more.

Here is all you needed to type: Paulette endorsement announced by well-known physician, Dr. John Covington.

You are not doing yourself any favors by acting the way you did in your above post. Most people here are not into games, and are much more intelligent than you are giving them credit.



[/quo
Games?????? Well, to make it easier, I just won't post anymore of my news reports here.

 

[Foxmeister]

Whatever.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

Dr John has been around this County a very long time, but is no longer practicing medicine. I have gotten to know him pretty good by attending Commissioner meetings and other County events. He is a great fellow and very easy to talk to.

But I have also met Paulette a few times and how she got elected is beyond me! Another politician with the personality of a dead fish. Very cold to anyone that cannot help her or has lots of money. She will not get my vote either.

I know Paulette as she is my friend. There is zero wrong with her personality, she is actually pretty smart. People hate her for whatever the reason is, which personally I could careless...but she is not dumb nor cold to anyone. She also did exactly everything she said she would do in the past 2 years in the House. I also could bring up something that I know about one of her challengers but I won't. If you knew Paulette, you'd understand but you don't...only hearsay. And yes, I know about her financial issues related to her business and of what she is doing about it to resolve it. But hey, no one cares about that other than bash her by listening to third party jerks who have an agenda and will do whatever they can to hurt her in any way possible or flat out lie.

And speaking of lies...Mason is way off base and is lying about Heath wanting to end the Hope Scholarship. That is completely false.

I'll agree that a lot of people are making assumptions about why she hasn't paid her taxes and Xerox. It could very well be she had a lot of uncollected receivables because a lot of her customers were not paying on time. It very well could have come down to making a decision on "Do I pay my employees for their work or do I pay the taxes?" I would have to say in a situation like this, you pay your employees first and try to make some arrangements about he taxes. A lot of people are concluding her business was thriving and everyone was paying her business on time, but she just decided to not pay her bills because she wants to take expensive vacations and own expensive things.

I have no idea how aggressively she's been working with the state and feds to resolve the tax issues, but you would think being a member of the state house and wanting to continue in that role, she's working aggressively to resolve them.

The truth of the matter is, if these problems are not resolved by the time of her hearing, she will most likely have her name removed from the ballot. For us in 19, that is not good at all as that leaves us with two very suspect candidates to choose from.

The problems she's facing today are much worse than the insurance and divorce issues that were brought up during her last campaign as these problems will most likely get her removed from the ballot.

What is very disappointing about this whole thing is, she knew these problems were serious. She didn't think very far ahead nor was she very concerned with the people of her district or the GOP as she should have been in this matter. She knew whether or not she had the financial means to clear this up before the deadline for filing candidacy. It does appear to me she was hoping this mess would remain hidden so her candidacy would not be challenged.

Because it's obvious she does not have the financial means to resolve these issues with the IRS, state, and Xerox; she should have announced she was not seeking re-election for personal reasons. This would have allowed someone who would be willing to represent the 19th that is more qualified than the other two candidates we now have to chose from.

I'm sorry Chris, but it does appear to me that Paulette was thinking more about keeping her seat in the House than the people of the 19th and the GOP.

Now it looks like one of the other two is going to be our next rep and they will give the GOP a black eye because they are indeed running as RINOs to get elected.

Sorry Fox, you don't know the whole issue in what she is dealing with, with her company that sank because of this economy. She is trying to balance her company finance issues and her reelection campaign and that is not an easy task for anyone to deal with. What I see and not necessarily here, is a lot of hatred for her, for whatever the reason. The timing is bad but she does what she has to do and is working on those issues that won't be resolved over night. Businesses and citizens alike are dealing with the worst of times. What makes her any different? Nothing...she's as human as everyone else.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

I never saw any so called rule about posting any text under the articles that I write.

I also don't write for free and a part of me making money is by link clicks.

Again, I write those articles. So what some of you are saying is for me to post the entire article because you want to know whether you want to read it or not or because your phones don't do well on the site?

I am not sure what to do about the phone issues but I don't post all of my articles and not get paid. Most of my articles it takes an hour or more to write up and publish.

I write GOP politics because I enjoy it and enjoy politics. But I also do it for the money as nothing is free and I work hard at getting what information I can get out to everyone.

I mean, I already stated what the article is about. Ugh...never mind. :dunno

No one is asking you to post your entire article. Just give us enough to want to open it. Some people can't go to links from their phones so posting a snippet peaks their interest. When they get home then they can actually open the link because they want to read more.

Just posting a link without any text is basically spamming. I know you're not a spammer Chris.

NG, I am aware of that. However, there is no share link to this site that takes a sentence or two in posting. I have to market my articles all over the place and it is not easy to do and is takes a lot of time not to mention the time it takes to write it up. The title of the article is what makes people go read the article. After working 40 hours a week, take 2 hours a day driving there and back, do this and that with my home, yard, shopping and article writing to make extra money and there is only one of me, it is not easy to do. I am sorry people got all banged up just because I posted one of my articles, and I haven't posted all of my articles here, with just the link although I put the title of the news in the subject line. I do what I can as there's only so many hours in a day.

 

[naturegirl]

I never saw any so called rule about posting any text under the articles that I write.

I also don't write for free and a part of me making money is by link clicks.

Again, I write those articles. So what some of you are saying is for me to post the entire article because you want to know whether you want to read it or not or because your phones don't do well on the site?

I am not sure what to do about the phone issues but I don't post all of my articles and not get paid. Most of my articles it takes an hour or more to write up and publish.

I write GOP politics because I enjoy it and enjoy politics. But I also do it for the money as nothing is free and I work hard at getting what information I can get out to everyone.

I mean, I already stated what the article is about. Ugh...never mind. :dunno

No one is asking you to post your entire article. Just give us enough to want to open it. Some people can't go to links from their phones so posting a snippet peaks their interest. When they get home then they can actually open the link because they want to read more.

Just posting a link without any text is basically spamming. I know you're not a spammer Chris.

NG, I am aware of that. However, there is no share link to this site that takes a sentence or two in posting. I have to market my articles all over the place and it is not easy to do and is takes a lot of time not to mention the time it takes to write it up. The title of the article is what makes people go read the article. After working 40 hours a week, take 2 hours a day driving there and back, do this and that with my home, yard, shopping and article writing to make extra money and there is only one of me, it is not easy to do. I am sorry people got all banged up just because I posted one of my articles, and I haven't posted all of my articles here, with just the link although I put the title of the news in the subject line. I do what I can as there's only so many hours in a day.

I'm not trying to argue with you but without more info, it's spam and spam is against the rules. I just copied and pasted a paragraph from your article, could you not do that?? It would help everyone, including you. Just a suggestion.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

I never saw any so called rule about posting any text under the articles that I write.

I also don't write for free and a part of me making money is by link clicks.

Again, I write those articles. So what some of you are saying is for me to post the entire article because you want to know whether you want to read it or not or because your phones don't do well on the site?

I am not sure what to do about the phone issues but I don't post all of my articles and not get paid. Most of my articles it takes an hour or more to write up and publish.

I write GOP politics because I enjoy it and enjoy politics. But I also do it for the money as nothing is free and I work hard at getting what information I can get out to everyone.

I mean, I already stated what the article is about. Ugh...never mind. :dunno

No one is asking you to post your entire article. Just give us enough to want to open it. Some people can't go to links from their phones so posting a snippet peaks their interest. When they get home then they can actually open the link because they want to read more.

Just posting a link without any text is basically spamming. I know you're not a spammer Chris.

NG, I am aware of that. However, there is no share link to this site that takes a sentence or two in posting. I have to market my articles all over the place and it is not easy to do and is takes a lot of time not to mention the time it takes to write it up. The title of the article is what makes people go read the article. After working 40 hours a week, take 2 hours a day driving there and back, do this and that with my home, yard, shopping and article writing to make extra money and there is only one of me, it is not easy to do. I am sorry people got all banged up just because I posted one of my articles, and I haven't posted all of my articles here, with just the link although I put the title of the news in the subject line. I do what I can as there's only so many hours in a day.

I'm not trying to argue with you but without more info, it's spam and spam is against the rules. I just copied and pasted a paragraph from your article, could you not do that?? It would help everyone, including you. Just a suggestion.

Okay, okay, okay. Geesh

 

[Foxmeister]

Dr John has been around this County a very long time, but is no longer practicing medicine. I have gotten to know him pretty good by attending Commissioner meetings and other County events. He is a great fellow and very easy to talk to.

But I have also met Paulette a few times and how she got elected is beyond me! Another politician with the personality of a dead fish. Very cold to anyone that cannot help her or has lots of money. She will not get my vote either.

I know Paulette as she is my friend. There is zero wrong with her personality, she is actually pretty smart. People hate her for whatever the reason is, which personally I could careless...but she is not dumb nor cold to anyone. She also did exactly everything she said she would do in the past 2 years in the House. I also could bring up something that I know about one of her challengers but I won't. If you knew Paulette, you'd understand but you don't...only hearsay. And yes, I know about her financial issues related to her business and of what she is doing about it to resolve it. But hey, no one cares about that other than bash her by listening to third party jerks who have an agenda and will do whatever they can to hurt her in any way possible or flat out lie.

And speaking of lies...Mason is way off base and is lying about Heath wanting to end the Hope Scholarship. That is completely false.

I'll agree that a lot of people are making assumptions about why she hasn't paid her taxes and Xerox. It could very well be she had a lot of uncollected receivables because a lot of her customers were not paying on time. It very well could have come down to making a decision on "Do I pay my employees for their work or do I pay the taxes?" I would have to say in a situation like this, you pay your employees first and try to make some arrangements about he taxes. A lot of people are concluding her business was thriving and everyone was paying her business on time, but she just decided to not pay her bills because she wants to take expensive vacations and own expensive things.

I have no idea how aggressively she's been working with the state and feds to resolve the tax issues, but you would think being a member of the state house and wanting to continue in that role, she's working aggressively to resolve them.

The truth of the matter is, if these problems are not resolved by the time of her hearing, she will most likely have her name removed from the ballot. For us in 19, that is not good at all as that leaves us with two very suspect candidates to choose from.

The problems she's facing today are much worse than the insurance and divorce issues that were brought up during her last campaign as these problems will most likely get her removed from the ballot.

What is very disappointing about this whole thing is, she knew these problems were serious. She didn't think very far ahead nor was she very concerned with the people of her district or the GOP as she should have been in this matter. She knew whether or not she had the financial means to clear this up before the deadline for filing candidacy. It does appear to me she was hoping this mess would remain hidden so her candidacy would not be challenged.

Because it's obvious she does not have the financial means to resolve these issues with the IRS, state, and Xerox; she should have announced she was not seeking re-election for personal reasons. This would have allowed someone who would be willing to represent the 19th that is more qualified than the other two candidates we now have to chose from.

I'm sorry Chris, but it does appear to me that Paulette was thinking more about keeping her seat in the House than the people of the 19th and the GOP.

Now it looks like one of the other two is going to be our next rep and they will give the GOP a black eye because they are indeed running as RINOs to get elected.

Sorry Fox, you don't know the whole issue in what she is dealing with, with her company that sank because of this economy. She is trying to balance her company finance issues and her reelection campaign and that is not an easy task for anyone to deal with. What I see and not necessarily here, is a lot of hatred for her, for whatever the reason. The timing is bad but she does what she has to do and is working on those issues that won't be resolved over night. Businesses and citizens alike are dealing with the worst of times. What makes her any different? Nothing...she's as human as everyone else.

Chris, what did I say in my post? I said she most likely had problems with customers paying her for the services they received for her companies services forcing her to make the decision between paying her taxes or paying her employees.

You can't ignore the fact that as our state rep, she should have had known these tax liens would make her ineligible to be on the ballot and if she knew she couldn't pay those liens off, she should have been responsible enough not to attempt to run again.

We all know very well and I'm sure she was very aware as well that there is an element who opposed her that would keep digging into her personal and business affairs to where this would be brought out during her campaign for re-election and someone would most likely file a challenge to the legality of her being a candidate because of these issues.

She should have been responsible enough to know there was no way for her to clear these liens and comply with the judgement against her to pay the Xerox attorneys. When she made the decision to seek another term as our rep, knowing these things would not be cleared up in time, she was in fact being irresponsible to the people she was wanting to continue to represent. That's the bottom line Chris.

If these matters are not cleared up they will have no choice but to remove her name from the ballot because these debts make her ineligible. Because of those debts, we will have a liberal representing us under the Gold Dome. This is a very serious issue to me because I live in the District 19 and this directly effects me and everyone else who lives within the district who wants a conservative, not a liberal representing us.

Can you even see how having a liberal calling him or herself a Republican will tarnish the reputation of our county GOP?

I'm sorry, but she should have done the right thing and announced in plenty of time she was not seeking another term so another true conservative could step up to the plate and run. Instead, it appears she was wishing this matter would go away, kept it from the party, and tried to hide it from the voters so she could continue being our rep. That my friend was what was irresponsible on her part.

 

[Madea]

Chris, the majority of us here support Paulette over the other two candidates. We are actually seeking information to be able to defend her against this information that is coming out. I originally posted the "ugh" because I wasn't in a place where I could click. So, instead of understanding you choose to get angry with us. I wasn't angry. I'M TRYING TO HELP!

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

Dr John has been around this County a very long time, but is no longer practicing medicine. I have gotten to know him pretty good by attending Commissioner meetings and other County events. He is a great fellow and very easy to talk to.

But I have also met Paulette a few times and how she got elected is beyond me! Another politician with the personality of a dead fish. Very cold to anyone that cannot help her or has lots of money. She will not get my vote either.

I know Paulette as she is my friend. There is zero wrong with her personality, she is actually pretty smart. People hate her for whatever the reason is, which personally I could careless...but she is not dumb nor cold to anyone. She also did exactly everything she said she would do in the past 2 years in the House. I also could bring up something that I know about one of her challengers but I won't. If you knew Paulette, you'd understand but you don't...only hearsay. And yes, I know about her financial issues related to her business and of what she is doing about it to resolve it. But hey, no one cares about that other than bash her by listening to third party jerks who have an agenda and will do whatever they can to hurt her in any way possible or flat out lie.

And speaking of lies...Mason is way off base and is lying about Heath wanting to end the Hope Scholarship. That is completely false.

I'll agree that a lot of people are making assumptions about why she hasn't paid her taxes and Xerox. It could very well be she had a lot of uncollected receivables because a lot of her customers were not paying on time. It very well could have come down to making a decision on "Do I pay my employees for their work or do I pay the taxes?" I would have to say in a situation like this, you pay your employees first and try to make some arrangements about he taxes. A lot of people are concluding her business was thriving and everyone was paying her business on time, but she just decided to not pay her bills because she wants to take expensive vacations and own expensive things.

I have no idea how aggressively she's been working with the state and feds to resolve the tax issues, but you would think being a member of the state house and wanting to continue in that role, she's working aggressively to resolve them.

The truth of the matter is, if these problems are not resolved by the time of her hearing, she will most likely have her name removed from the ballot. For us in 19, that is not good at all as that leaves us with two very suspect candidates to choose from.

The problems she's facing today are much worse than the insurance and divorce issues that were brought up during her last campaign as these problems will most likely get her removed from the ballot.

What is very disappointing about this whole thing is, she knew these problems were serious. She didn't think very far ahead nor was she very concerned with the people of her district or the GOP as she should have been in this matter. She knew whether or not she had the financial means to clear this up before the deadline for filing candidacy. It does appear to me she was hoping this mess would remain hidden so her candidacy would not be challenged.

Because it's obvious she does not have the financial means to resolve these issues with the IRS, state, and Xerox; she should have announced she was not seeking re-election for personal reasons. This would have allowed someone who would be willing to represent the 19th that is more qualified than the other two candidates we now have to chose from.

I'm sorry Chris, but it does appear to me that Paulette was thinking more about keeping her seat in the House than the people of the 19th and the GOP.

Now it looks like one of the other two is going to be our next rep and they will give the GOP a black eye because they are indeed running as RINOs to get elected.

Sorry Fox, you don't know the whole issue in what she is dealing with, with her company that sank because of this economy. She is trying to balance her company finance issues and her reelection campaign and that is not an easy task for anyone to deal with. What I see and not necessarily here, is a lot of hatred for her, for whatever the reason. The timing is bad but she does what she has to do and is working on those issues that won't be resolved over night. Businesses and citizens alike are dealing with the worst of times. What makes her any different? Nothing...she's as human as everyone else.

Chris, what did I say in my post? I said she most likely had problems with customers paying her for the services they received for her companies services forcing her to make the decision between paying her taxes or paying her employees.

You can't ignore the fact that as our state rep, she should have had known these tax liens would make her ineligible to be on the ballot and if she knew she couldn't pay those liens off, she should have been responsible enough not to attempt to run again.

We all know very well and I'm sure she was very aware as well that there is an element who opposed her that would keep digging into her personal and business affairs to where this would be brought out during her campaign for re-election and someone would most likely file a challenge to the legality of her being a candidate because of these issues.

She should have been responsible enough to know there was no way for her to clear these liens and comply with the judgement against her to pay the Xerox attorneys. When she made the decision to seek another term as our rep, knowing these things would not be cleared up in time, she was in fact being irresponsible to the people she was wanting to continue to represent. That's the bottom line Chris.

If these matters are not cleared up they will have no choice but to remove her name from the ballot because these debts make her ineligible. Because of those debts, we will have a liberal representing us under the Gold Dome. This is a very serious issue to me because I live in the District 19 and this directly effects me and everyone else who lives within the district who wants a conservative, not a liberal representing us.

Can you even see how having a liberal calling him or herself a Republican will tarnish the reputation of our county GOP?

I'm sorry, but she should have done the right thing and announced in plenty of time she was not seeking another term so another true conservative could step up to the plate and run. Instead, it appears she was wishing this matter would go away, kept it from the party, and tried to hide it from the voters so she could continue being our rep. That my friend was what was irresponsible on her part.

I read what you said. I only pointed out as to why should someone give up there job, representative or not,as she is running to be reelected in which she is paid, due to her business problems/failings that others are having as well? A true conservative stays, works, and works out her issues like the rest of us and she has counsel and all in dealing with her matters and she has been working with the IRS. I mean really, you know? BS Innuendos and hatred of her is what is driving this slamming her is all about. I have seen it, heard it and read it. Does anyone even think that for one, her husband makes good money and they she needs to get paid, of what little the state pays, so she can pay her debts down? So I know what I am talking about in this matter with her. Maybe one need to look at one of her opponents and their issues they had with the local Catholic church. No one is talking about that now are they? AND, there are NO other true conservatives running other than her. Michael is no where near a conservative, knows nothing, and the other is running on an agenda. So Paulette is the one and she is also dealing with issues like millions of other people are. If the state decides she can't run, then so be it. But, I am not going to bash her for business problems due to the economy. That is not right and is completely wrong.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

Chris, the majority of us here support Paulette over the other two candidates. We are actually seeking information to be able to defend her against this information that is coming out. I originally posted the "ugh" because I wasn't in a place where I could click. So, instead of understanding you choose to get angry with us. I wasn't angry. I'M TRYING TO HELP!

Then I apologize.

 

[Madea]

Chris, if you read the threads, most folks prefer Paulette over anyone else running in this district. Instead of getting angry with us, understand that WE are TRYING to understand.

 

[Madea]

Chris, the majority of us here support Paulette over the other two candidates. We are actually seeking information to be able to defend her against this information that is coming out. I originally posted the "ugh" because I wasn't in a place where I could click. So, instead of understanding you choose to get angry with us. I wasn't angry. I'M TRYING TO HELP!

Then I apologize.

Thank you. Apology accepted.

 

[Foxmeister]

Chris, if you read the threads, most folks prefer Paulette over anyone else running in this district. Instead of getting angry with us, understand that WE are TRYING to understand.

Exactly!!! We would much rather see her continue as our rep than have one of the other two.

 

[LisaC]

My only comment about her legal affairs is that she is currently in contempt in th U.S. District Court over nonpayment of court ordered fees to Xerox's attorney's fees. The judge gave her 90 days from last Friday to pay them or she will go to jail. This has been ongoing for months and she still hasn't paid. The fact that she willingly ignores a court order, makes me question her judgment.

 

[Foxmeister]

My only comment about her legal affairs is that she is currently in contempt in th U.S. District Court over nonpayment of court ordered fees to Xerox's attorney's fees. The judge gave her 90 days from last Friday to pay them or she will go to jail. This has been ongoing for months and she still hasn't paid. The fact that she willingly ignores a court order, makes me question her judgment.

I agree. One can say she doesn't have the money to pay, but that still doesn't sit well with a lot of voters and only provides her political opponents with ammo.

 

[LisaC]

My only comment about her legal affairs is that she is currently in contempt in th U.S. District Court over nonpayment of court ordered fees to Xerox's attorney's fees. The judge gave her 90 days from last Friday to pay them or she will go to jail. This has been ongoing for months and she still hasn't paid. The fact that she willingly ignores a court order, makes me question her judgment.

I agree. One can say she doesn't have the money to pay, but that still doesn't sit well with a lot of voters and only provides her political opponents with ammo.

One could say that, but I believe she loaned her campaign $30,000 - that's more than the judgment... :dunno

 

[Foxmeister]

My only comment about her legal affairs is that she is currently in contempt in th U.S. District Court over nonpayment of court ordered fees to Xerox's attorney's fees. The judge gave her 90 days from last Friday to pay them or she will go to jail. This has been ongoing for months and she still hasn't paid. The fact that she willingly ignores a court order, makes me question her judgment.

I agree. One can say she doesn't have the money to pay, but that still doesn't sit well with a lot of voters and only provides her political opponents with ammo.

One could say that, but I believe she loaned her campaign $30,000 - that's more than the judgment... :dunno

That loan could have been in the form of putting together her mailers and sending them out, where as no cash was involved in the loan.

 

[Madea]

My only comment about her legal affairs is that she is currently in contempt in th U.S. District Court over nonpayment of court ordered fees to Xerox's attorney's fees. The judge gave her 90 days from last Friday to pay them or she will go to jail. This has been ongoing for months and she still hasn't paid. The fact that she willingly ignores a court order, makes me question her judgment.

While I do agree for the most part, we only have surface information. We don't know if appeals, etc are happening. We are assuming that she's willingly ignoring, but I really don't believe that would be the case.