ISIS Camp Near Texas ? ? ?

[honeybunny]

Nothing surprises me anymore :


http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/04/isis-camp-a-few-miles-from-texas-mexican-authorities-confirm/



:runaway

 

[mei lan]

Nope...not a thing surprises me anymore.

 

[The Sound Guy]

Not unexpected. The corruption on the south side of the boarder makes it open season for anyone to move in.

Liberals have been poo-pooing this possibility for months, I'm sure they will discount this report as well.

 

[Guard Dad]

Time for a training accident

 

[ShoeDiva]

I can not find a verifiable source that this story is true. It is even mentioned in Snopes that it is not. Judicial Watch is the only one that has credible sources in the Mexico and this story? (The exact story is repeated numerous times on the internet, but they all cite JW or link back to them.)

I am not saying that Mexico does not have ISIS supporters, or people being trained, but I am saying this story is not totally believable and I am betting that the Mexican cartels and ISIS would have issue with each other. Maybe they will just take each other out.

 

[Madea]

Well, true or not, I don't expect that CNN will be providing any info. The JW story is current, the Snopes response is 6 months old. So, I'm not sure and I really don't have time to read through it all.

Would it surprise me? No, not really.

 

[Guard Dad]

Regarding Snopes...I think they generally do a fine job, but they have been shown to be biased on some issues that have political implications.

The owners are major friends of the Clintons.

This doesn't necessarily means they are wrong about the article here, but it might be wise to get other sources as well.

 

[honeybunny]

I can not find a verifiable source that this story is true. It is even mentioned in Snopes that it is not. Judicial Watch is the only one that has credible sources in the Mexico and this story? (The exact story is repeated numerous times on the internet, but they all cite JW or link back to them.)

I am not saying that Mexico does not have ISIS supporters, or people being trained, but I am saying this story is not totally believable and I am betting that the Mexican cartels and ISIS would have issue with each other. Maybe they will just take each other out.

Judicial Watch is a trustworthy source.

 

[honeybunny]

I can not find a verifiable source that this story is true. It is even mentioned in Snopes that it is not. Judicial Watch is the only one that has credible sources in the Mexico and this story? (The exact story is repeated numerous times on the internet, but they all cite JW or link back to them.)

I am not saying that Mexico does not have ISIS supporters, or people being trained, but I am saying this story is not totally believable and I am betting that the Mexican cartels and ISIS would have issue with each other. Maybe they will just take each other out.

Judicial Watch is a trustworthy source.

 

[ShoeDiva]

Well, true or not, I don't expect that CNN will be providing any info. The JW story is current, the Snopes response is 6 months old. So, I'm not sure and I really don't have time to read through it all.

Would it surprise me? No, not really.

Snopes story mentions yesterdays article.

 

[ShoeDiva]

I can not find a verifiable source that this story is true. It is even mentioned in Snopes that it is not. Judicial Watch is the only one that has credible sources in the Mexico and this story? (The exact story is repeated numerous times on the internet, but they all cite JW or link back to them.)

I am not saying that Mexico does not have ISIS supporters, or people being trained, but I am saying this story is not totally believable and I am betting that the Mexican cartels and ISIS would have issue with each other. Maybe they will just take each other out.

Judicial Watch is a trustworthy source.

According to ? This is the second time they have run a story similar to this. I just find it hard to believe they are the only ones with contacts. :dunno
http://www.kvia.com/news/us-federal-law-agencies-say-report-of-isis-in-anapra-mexico-is-unsubstantiated/32367718
http://www.kvia.com/news/rumors-of-isis-in-ciudad-juarez-unsubstantiated/27794390

 

[ShoeDiva]

Regarding Snopes...I think they generally do a fine job, but they have been shown to be biased on some issues that have political implications.

The owners are major friends of the Clintons.

This doesn't necessarily means they are wrong about the article here, but it might be wise to get other sources as well.

I did try to find other sources that the story was true. I could not, if you could point me in the direction of any story that is not linked back to JW I would read it.
I do understand that Snopes is not the final word, especially on political items, I just pointed out that this one has been addressed, more than once.

 

[honeybunny]

Well, true or not, I don't expect that CNN will be providing any info. The JW story is current, the Snopes response is 6 months old. So, I'm not sure and I really don't have time to read through it all.

Would it surprise me? No, not really.

Snopes story mentions yesterdays article.

Yep, they mention and dismiss the story in one motion without any proof at all :


Judicial Watch similarly claimed in an April 2015 article that "ISIS is operating a camp just a few miles
from El Paso, Texas," information apparently unknown to every news source other than Judicial Watch.


(insertrolleyeshere)

 

[ShoeDiva]

Well, true or not, I don't expect that CNN will be providing any info. The JW story is current, the Snopes response is 6 months old. So, I'm not sure and I really don't have time to read through it all.

Would it surprise me? No, not really.

Snopes story mentions yesterdays article.

Yep, they mention and dismiss the story in one motion without any proof at all :


Judicial Watch similarly claimed in an April 2015 article that "ISIS is operating a camp just a few miles
from El Paso, Texas," information apparently unknown to every news source other than Judicial Watch.


(insertrolleyeshere)

So JW knows more than any other news source since last year. :cantbelievemyeyes (the two stories they have, with their sources, that no one else is reporting on or know about.) Ok
Is anyone else reporting this that I have missed? Seriously, I can only find JW's articles. It is pretty unbelievable that they are they only ones with knowledge of this for the last year.
Again, I am not dismissing that ISIS is in Mexico, I believe they are here too, but the story? Not so much.

 

[Madea]

Well, true or not, I don't expect that CNN will be providing any info. The JW story is current, the Snopes response is 6 months old. So, I'm not sure and I really don't have time to read through it all.

Would it surprise me? No, not really.

Snopes story mentions yesterdays article.

I stopped reading on Snopes when I realized their response was six months old. :dunno Just didn't have time to read a lot. )

 

[J-man]

I too have no clue whether the story is true or not but it's been in the news heavily for a few days now. They have allegedly aired "simulated" executions from the U.S. side of the border. I'm not saying they didn't, or couldn't, but I do believe they will be in for a big surprise if they attempt their atrocities here. It will be completely different than in a poor, third world, indefensible city in the Middle East.

 

[ShoeDiva]

Well, true or not, I don't expect that CNN will be providing any info. The JW story is current, the Snopes response is 6 months old. So, I'm not sure and I really don't have time to read through it all.

Would it surprise me? No, not really.

Snopes story mentions yesterdays article.

I stopped reading on Snopes when I realized their response was six months old. :dunno Just didn't have time to read a lot. )

:thumbsup It is a long article.

 

[lotstodo]

Judicial Watch has friendly sources deep within the intelligence community. They have been the leaders (by months) on things like the NSA spying scandal and Bengazi. Their FACTS have been proven reliable, but they do have a point of view and they have been accused of spinning facts much like Fox News.

I am not surprised that they would be the first to report on a story with Intelligence implications, not at all. But know this. If JW is aware of it, it is no surprise to our government, as sources within our government were likely their original lead on this story even though they cite Mexican sources. So it is reasonable to assume that if this is in fact an active terrorist cell, that they are being set up for a hard fall.

 

[deewee]

Judicial Watch has friendly sources deep within the intelligence community. They have been the leaders (by months) on things like the NSA spying scandal and Bengazi. Their FACTS have been proven reliable, but they do have a point of view and they have been accused of spinning facts much like Fox News.

I am not surprised that they would be the first to report on a story with Intelligence implications, not at all. But know this. If JW is aware of it, it is no surprise to our government, as sources within our government were likely their original lead on this story even though they cite Mexican sources. So it is reasonable to assume that if this is in fact an active terrorist cell, that they are being set up for a hard fall.

:thumbsup

 

[ShoeDiva]

Judicial Watch has friendly sources deep within the intelligence community. They have been the leaders (by months) on things like the NSA spying scandal and Bengazi. Their FACTS have been proven reliable, but they do have a point of view and they have been accused of spinning facts much like Fox News.

I am not surprised that they would be the first to report on a story with Intelligence implications, not at all. But know this. If JW is aware of it, it is no surprise to our government, as sources within our government were likely their original lead on this story even though they cite Mexican sources. So it is reasonable to assume that if this is in fact an active terrorist cell, that they are being set up for a hard fall.

If they reported it first last year why are they reporting it like it is new?