Psycho GF drives boy to commit suicide - GUILTY!

Stellarvore

Expert Driver
http://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-announce-verdict-today-texting-suicide-case/story?id=48003147

So she was in a long distance relationship and texted this guy thousands of times to freaking kill himself when he confided in her that he was feeling suicidal. She literally told this boy that she supposedly cared for, repeatedly...to kill himself.

What. The. F***.

I hope she rots in hell. Look at those eyes. There's no soul in there. And that fivehead. Next time she'll probably kill in person. She's crying because she got caught and is being held accountable. If she was sorry it happened, there wouldn't have been that many messages sent.
 
I have mixed feelings about this one too. No doubt that she's a beotch from the depths of Hell, but "drive" someone to kill themselves? he did it.
 
I have mixed feelings about this one too. No doubt that she's a beotch from the depths of Hell, but "drive" someone to kill themselves? he did it.
Would probably have to see all the evidence to make a clear opinion on it. I do believe this though; if anyone is threatening to kill themselves, you should not encourage them to do so. A lot of times when someone calls someone and says they are about to kill themselves, they are really asking for your help. Many times they feel nobody cares and when their last plea to someone for help acts like they don't care, it seals the deal on their decision to die.
 
Would probably have to see all the evidence to make a clear opinion on it. I do believe this though; if anyone is threatening to kill themselves, you should not encourage them to do so. A lot of times when someone calls someone and says they are about to kill themselves, they are really asking for your help. Many times they feel nobody cares and when their last plea to someone for help acts like they don't care, it seals the deal on their decision to die.

:agreed:
 
I'm not defending what she did by any means. All I'm saying was that the final decision was his.

She needed to be convicted of something, but I'm not sure the sentence was the right one.
 
I'm not defending what she did by any means. All I'm saying was that the final decision was his.

She needed to be convicted of something, but I'm not sure the sentence was the right one.
Sure the final decision was his, but also understand that someone that serious about suicide is not mentally well. The last four years in the Army we had to go through suicide prevention training once every three months because the numbers of soldiers who had been to Iraq and Afghanistan who had committed suicide while still in service or sometime after being released from active duty. For the most part, suicidal people are suffering from deep depression, which is a mental disorder and are not thinking rationally.
 
She told him to get back in the truck when he had gotten out.
She did not tell anyone, like his parents or authorities that he intended on killing himself. Instead she kept asking him why he had not done it yet...very hard to read the text messages she sent.

You are right, he did it. He was depressed and mentally unstable. He did not need her in his life ... she ramped up the pressure to quit stalling and do it tonight.





While announcing the verdict today, Moniz said that Carter instructed Roy "to get back into the truck well knowing of all of the feelings he [had] exchanged with her, his ambiguities, his fears, his concerns."

"This court finds that instructing Mr. Roy to get back in the truck constituted wanton and reckless conduct," Moniz said.

The judge also noted that Carter admitted in texts that she took no action; she knew the location of the truck and did not notify Roy's mother or sisters.
 
Sure the final decision was his, but also understand that someone that serious about suicide is not mentally well. The last four years in the Army we had to go through suicide prevention training once every three months because the numbers of soldiers who had been to Iraq and Afghanistan who had committed suicide while still in service or sometime after being released from active duty. For the most part, suicidal people are suffering from deep depression, which is a mental disorder and are not thinking rationally.

so if the military recruiters totally disregard a 19 year old boy who at 12 was hospitalized for multiple attempts at suicide, then the military wonders why they, the responsible party of influence in future situations why they get suicides around wartime? They don''t care who they recruit as long as they have warm blood.
My son, who was suicidal and had to be hosptialized at 12 and on medication for 5 years (supposed to be more) but was so eloquently conned by a military recruiter who totally ignored his mental history and enrolled him in wartime. So if your theory is correct, then the military's PTSD problem is most likely caused by their own convincing of young adults or older who have a mental history of suicide to either committ suicide or have a long term mental health condition.
Suicide is a multifactoral issue. It's not plain black and white.
There are many relationships that cause deep depression that partners ignore. They continue doing critical and demeaning, unloving things and if the other has a history already of depression that usually ends in either a slow suicide or suicide.
Depression is a chemical imbalance in the brain.
So the military wasting money on inservices really when they should counsel recruiters who want to recruit people who have depression should be the focus.
Also if this theory is correct then the military causes many suicides a year. And they don't care either from the beginning.

I had a friend I worked with , a close one who had relationship problems with her 32 year old druggie son who lived with her.
She was always the nicest person and the first to ride in my new mustang in 2005 with me.

She had a discussion /argument and also had a history of depression and she told her son she was going to blow her head off.
She went in her back yard, got a lawn chair and shot herself in the head.
Did he cause it? Directly no she made that decision but she had been through so much pain from her abusive husband and son that in that moment she wanted relief. Indirectly, probably because there is just so much people can take being the caretaker of all for all time. When someone feels abandoned over and over and pretty much told their useless or do nothing right, that is conditioning someone to kill themselvess
Either people are part of the solution or part of the problem.

This girl was part of the problem.

When the conditions are favorable for a person who already is depressed, the liklihood is higher for suicide. It doesn't select whether you are in the military or not or rich or poor, white or black.
 
This will be blown out of the water on appeal. She was over-charged. She is certainly guilty of being a flaming bitch, likely to the point of criminal reckless conduct. The homicide charge is a big stretch from that however in that her constant badgering is not a physical act.
 
This will be blown out of the water on appeal. She was over-charged. She is certainly guilty of being a flaming bitch, likely to the point of criminal reckless conduct. The homicide charge is a big stretch from that however in that her constant badgering is not a physical act.


She was convicted of involuntary manslaughter...

;)
 
I think it will be overturned on appeal. Apparently it was a "long-distance" relationship which means she wasn't present when he killed himself. Obviously the boy suffered from some form of a psychological issue but he was the one who killed himself. It's a slippery slope to convict a person for words and suggestions, no matter how vile or evil, upon which someone else takes action.
 
The judge said two things that will come up in an appeal. First, that she was in effect whispering into his ear "kill yourself". Um, no, and if she was, that is still not a physical act. Second, that she failed to prevent the suicide when she had the chance by telling him to get back in the car. This is true, but from a legal standpoint it has no bearing since there is no law creating such a responsibility on a second party. It is in effect convicting the asshat who yells "jump"....evil, but not a crime.
 
The judge said two things that will come up in an appeal. First, that she was in effect whispering into his ear "kill yourself". Um, no, and if she was, that is still not a physical act. Second, that she failed to prevent the suicide when she had the chance by telling him to get back in the car. This is true, but from a legal standpoint it has no bearing since there is no law creating such a responsibility on a second party. It is in effect convicting the asshat who yells "jump"....evil, but not a crime.
Many lawyers are agreeing with the sentence of involuntary manslaughter. After reading what she wrote to him, I wish she could have been convicted of more. Though I know any more would be thrown out. There are quite a few good analyses of the verdict.
 
Probably not from a legal point of view.

Understand that I'm not defending her on a personal level, she's evil. I'm only opining from a legal perspective.
I am seeing many lawyers agreeing with this verdict, with lots of explanation as to why in this instance the law does/should permit this judgement. Egging him on, not getting help, taunting him,telling him she would take care of his family, telling him where to put the generator for the largest amount of carbon monoxide to get to him, telling him to get the F back in the truck when he got out, and worrying about him deleting the messages she sent. She is as guilty as if she took his life with her own hands.
What kind of monster does that?
Freedom of speech is one thing. She was not the mean girl that picked on him and just said why don't you kill yourself, or even said yeah that is a good idea when he said he was going to. What she did to someone that had issues and thought she cared....it is absolutely disgusting.
 
She is to some degree responsible for the unnatural death of another human being. She will appeal. Depends on what judge hears her appeal as to the outcome. Even if over turned she will be found guilty of some form of complicity. She is by any account a horrible person which unfortunately is not against the law. I hope her parents are proud of the spoiled sociopathic little bitch.
 
Back
Top