What??????

naturegirl

Rolling down the highway
Google is telling me the Daily Caller is an attack page?? Do ya think some folks in DC might have something to do with this???
 
Google does a fine job with their products. But...their management leans so far to the left they could throw the Earth off it's axis, and they've been known to biased against conservative sites and individuals before.
 
naturegirl said:
LisaC said:
I've never heard of the Daily Caller... :dunno

It's a pretty good site, lots of news you don't hear everywhere. There's lots of stuff there. Go visit them, I promise it's not an attack page. I've been visiting them for a couple of years. http://dailycaller.com/

You don't get paid if I click on it, do you? :whistle
 
LisaC said:
naturegirl said:
LisaC said:
I've never heard of the Daily Caller... :dunno

It's a pretty good site, lots of news you don't hear everywhere. There's lots of stuff there. Go visit them, I promise it's not an attack page. I've been visiting them for a couple of years. http://dailycaller.com/

You don't get paid if I click on it, do you? :whistle

Only if you click on those stripper videos.
 
LisaC said:
naturegirl said:
LisaC said:
I've never heard of the Daily Caller... :dunno

It's a pretty good site, lots of news you don't hear everywhere. There's lots of stuff there. Go visit them, I promise it's not an attack page. I've been visiting them for a couple of years. http://dailycaller.com/

You don't get paid if I click on it, do you? :whistle

Nope.............they haven't even contributed to my campaign. :Ninja
 
Keep in mind that sometimes content from other providers (like advertisers) is displayed on a webpage. This content does sometimes contain code that many people would judge as harmful. This code is usually found and deleted by the site shortly after it appears, and the site then becomes available again. This sort of thing is not the fault of the filter (in this case google) or the host site.
 
lotstodo said:
Keep in mind that sometimes content from other providers (like advertisers) is displayed on a webpage. This content does sometimes contain code that many people would judge as harmful. This code is usually found and deleted by the site shortly after it appears, and the site then becomes available again. This sort of thing is not the fault of the filter (in this case google) or the host site.

But I've gone to that site daily for a couple of years, I just got the notice for the first time today. I'm thinking Google did a quick upgrade. ;)
 
lotstodo said:
Keep in mind that sometimes content from other providers (like advertisers) is displayed on a webpage. This content does sometimes contain code that many people would judge as harmful. This code is usually found and deleted by the site shortly after it appears, and the site then becomes available again. This sort of thing is not the fault of the filter (in this case google) or the host site.

I am positive that you are the most intelligent man I know.
 
naturegirl said:
lotstodo said:
Keep in mind that sometimes content from other providers (like advertisers) is displayed on a webpage. This content does sometimes contain code that many people would judge as harmful. This code is usually found and deleted by the site shortly after it appears, and the site then becomes available again. This sort of thing is not the fault of the filter (in this case google) or the host site.




But I've gone to that site daily for a couple of years, I just got the notice for the first time today. I'm thinking Google did a quick upgrade. ;)
That's what I'm saying. If an advertiser introduced provocative code, either on purpose or by accident, the filter would catch it. Minutes or perhaps hours later this code would be discovered by the site (Daily Caller), usually after customer complaints. That code would be immediately removed. The site is usually on the spit list for no more than an hour or less. Code removed, problem solved. This is not at all uncommon, and affects even the most popular websites. I have gotten warnings on CNN, and even Amazon.
 
lotstodo said:
naturegirl said:
lotstodo said:
Keep in mind that sometimes content from other providers (like advertisers) is displayed on a webpage. This content does sometimes contain code that many people would judge as harmful. This code is usually found and deleted by the site shortly after it appears, and the site then becomes available again. This sort of thing is not the fault of the filter (in this case google) or the host site.




But I've gone to that site daily for a couple of years, I just got the notice for the first time today. I'm thinking Google did a quick upgrade. ;)
That's what I'm saying. If an advertiser introduced provocative code, either on purpose or by accident, the filter would catch it. Minutes or perhaps hours later this code would be discovered by the site (Daily Caller), usually after customer complaints. That code would be immediately removed. The site is usually on the spit list for no more than an hour or less. Code removed, problem solved. This is not at all uncommon, and affects even the most popular websites. I have gotten warnings on CNN, and even Amazon.

You're so smart!! :love

I have adblock, never see any ads but that doesn't mean they're not there. :)
 
Back
Top