Trump

cptlo

Pursuit Driver
Trump: I Tried But Failed to Bulldoze Elderly Widow's Home for My Casino Parking Lot

Or in one case, not even a little guy, but a little old lady. Among civil-libertarian Trumpologists, Vera Coking has become something of a folk hero. As outlined by the Washington Post's Manuel Roig-Franzia and the Institute for Justice (whose lawyers represented -Coking), in the 1990s, Coking was a then-septuagenarian widow and proud owner of a three-story boarding house in Atlantic City, where she'd lived since 1961.

As casino developers circled, her house became vulture bait. In the '80s, Penthouse's Bob Guccione offered her $1 million to sell so he could throw up a casino on her land. Coking passed. So Guccione began building around her, going so far as to construct skeletal beams over her roof. But in the middle of construction, his project went bust.

Trump swooped in, having bought Guccione's remains, seeking to enlarge his casino empire with the Trump Plaza (now closed). He too made a play for her land, desiring to turn it into a waiting area for limousines. While attempting to get her to sell, Trump buttered her up with Neil Diamond tickets, though Coking had no idea who Neil Diamond was. She still stubbornly refused.

So Trump went to work around her, dismantling Guccione's unfinished construction. And while Trump has aggressively disparaged the condition of her house, as though that justifies trying to take it, Coking's lawyers charged that demolition crews had started a fire on her roof, broken windows, removed her fire escape, and "nearly destroyed the entire third story of her home by dropping concrete blocks through the roof." Coking still refused to sell.

Enter the city's Casino Reinvestment Development Authority, a highfalutin' name for an eminent domain operation, working in cahoots with Trump to remove Coking's house from her possession. In 1994, the casino authority made her an offer she couldn't refuse: They would give her $251,250 for her house (750 grand less than what Guccione had offered a decade prior). And if she didn't accept within 30 days, they'd take her to court to snatch her land through eminent domain.

Coking and the city ended up duking it out in court, Trump throwing in with the casino authority. But after years of wrangling, in 1998, the Superior Court of New Jersey ruled in Coking's favor, shutting Trump and Co. down. Trump, who has repeatedly expressed rapturous support for eminent domain, claiming it's necessary to build roads and schools (if not limousine parking lots at casinos), called Coking's house "a tremendous blight on Atlantic City."

The brassy widow, for her part, called Trump "a maggot, a cockroach, and a crumb."

The man is not a conservative. He should be running as a democrat.
 
That is an old story I have read before. If we are going to continue dumping on Trump in numerous threads I guess we should have a thread for each potential nominee. From much that I have read the others are not much better.

I am not even a huge Trump fan and I am a bit over the constant he is this or that. :))
 
ShoeDiva date=1453673602 said:
That is an old story I have read before. If we are going to continue dumping on Trump in numerous threads I guess we should have a thread for each potential nominee. From much that I have read the others are not much better.

I am not even a huge Trump fan and I am a bit over the constant he is this or that. :))


Just doing my part to save the country.
smiley-with-us-flag.gif
 
cptlo306 date=1453675024 said:
ShoeDiva date=1453673602 said:
That is an old story I have read before. If we are going to continue dumping on Trump in numerous threads I guess we should have a thread for each potential nominee. From much that I have read the others are not much better.

I am not even a huge Trump fan and I am a bit over the constant he is this or that. :))


Just doing my part to save the country.
smiley-with-us-flag.gif
:laugh :laugh :laugh
 
I would vote for Sanders before I would vote for Trump. The damage that Sanders could cause it controllable in Congress. The damage that Trump could cause is completely out of anyone's control.
 
unionmom date=1453677350 said:
I would vote for Sanders before I would vote for Trump. The damage that Sanders could cause it controllable in Congress. The damage that Trump could cause is completely out of anyone's control.
:faint
 
unionmom date=1453677350 said:
I would vote for Sanders before I would vote for Trump. The damage that Sanders could cause it controllable in Congress. The damage that Trump could cause is completely out of anyone's control.
I'm not a Trump fan, but I don't think I'd go that far.
 
Heck, I'd vote for Cynthia McKinney before I'd vote for Trump. That man is a bull in a china shop and he's going to cause untold problems for us if he gets into office.
 
Sanders would be able to be stopped by Congress ... Trump's mouth could be our biggest issue. Congress can't stop that.
 
Typical bully-brat Trump move. Do it his way or he'll have a tantrum. That will work really well on the world stage.

jacka$$
 
Eh, I really do not blame him for that and our last boycott of a debate got a lot of press, so maybe it is calculated.

If he wins the nomination, would he do the same when debating Hillary? Surely he's bound to get some tough questions in those debates too. If he's supposed to be this tough guy that can handle anything then he should be able to handle Megyn Kelly (Have I ever mentioned that she's HOT?).
 
If he wins the nomination, would he do the same when debating Hillary? Surely he's bound to get some tough questions in those debates too. If he's supposed to be this tough guy that can handle anything then he should be able to handle Megyn Kelly (Have I ever mentioned that she's HOT?).
Maybe. :p (On both him boycotting and you might have mentioned she is hot once or twice)
 
Back
Top