The self-proclaimed "party of women" apparently don't believe...

Here's what she's really saying, "Ladies when a woman runs for president, you should vote for her simply because she's a woman. Just because you may be a conservative and the woman candidate may be a flaming communist; you have to put aside your own political beliefs and vote for the woman. The only exception to this rule is when the woman candidate is a a Republican. Then by all means feel free to vote against her."
 
Here's what she's really saying, "Ladies when a woman runs for president, you should vote for her simply because she's a woman. Just because you may be a conservative and the woman candidate may be a flaming communist; you have to put aside your own political beliefs and vote for the woman. The only exception to this rule is when the woman candidate is a a Republican. Then by all means feel free to vote against her."

Why not? Worked for Obama and the color of his skin.
 
If the women in my life are any indication, Hillary talked herself out of a job. Yes most of the women I know are conservative, and most had a favorite Republican in the primary that was not Donald Trump. In fact, most of the women I know disliked Trump about as much as Hillary if not more, when he won the nomination. Several gave Hillary a second look, and watched the debates and heard her speeches with a truly open mind. Only one of those women, out of about five or six actually voted for Hillary because she came off as an out of touch oligarch bent on fundamentally changing the United States when she should have been trying to appear to be the sane one. All she had to do was STFU, and she was so full of herself and sure of her victory that she just couldn't. She had been inside that beltway liberal cocoon for too long. She had to insult everyone who was not a person of color residing in a blue state. The one vote she got was because this lady just couldn't bring herself to vote for Johnson, even though he was her favorite.
 
Here's what she's really saying, "Ladies when a woman runs for president, you should vote for her simply because she's a woman. Just because you may be a conservative and the woman candidate may be a flaming communist; you have to put aside your own political beliefs and vote for the woman. The only exception to this rule is when the woman candidate is a a Republican. Then by all means feel free to vote against her."
Is "Aunt Thomasinna" a thing? Because a woman Republican is without a doubt seen as a traitor to her kind by the progressives.
 
the women who voted for trump did so because they didn't care for Hillary. Most I know do not like Trump himself either. His integrity is as shady as hers so there wasn't much choice in the matter. He is an explosive narcisicist that is best left to reality TV than politics. JMHO.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...-said-about-women_us_55d356a8e4b07addcb442023

I don't think he has much integrity either but this is what is running the country. A little boy who has tantrums on twitter and objectifies women.
 
the women who voted for trump did so because they didn't care for Hillary. .

Many did, but not all. I know a lot of women who were firmly on the Trump train shortly after he threw his hat into the ring. I had some good arguments with some of them back during the primary, trying to persuade them to support a different candidate; but they were in all about Trump.

I agree with you about his demeanor and public behavior. On the other hand; most of the things he's actually done have been pretty good. I do wish more people would separate the two issues so they could look past their personal dislike of the man so they could objectively grade the rest of his performance.
 
Many did, but not all. I know a lot of women who were firmly on the Trump train shortly after he threw his hat into the ring. I had some good arguments with some of them back during the primary, trying to persuade them to support a different candidate; but they were in all about Trump.

I agree with you about his demeanor and public behavior. On the other hand; most of the things he's actually done have been pretty good. I do wish more people would separate the two issues so they could look past their personal dislike of the man so they could objectively grade the rest of his performance.
I don't think women dislike him as a person. They dislike his crude treatment of women over a span of many years. That may not matter to some people but to many it does. I will have to respectfully disagree that he is doing any good for this country. He speaks out both sides of his mouth. Sometimes I think he has early dementia. I know alot of women who are Republicans that actually changed their party due to his actions whichare dividing America into two groups. The rich and the poor. No middle class.
Most if not all women who I have talked to said they voted for him "because they didn't have a choice" and didn't want Hillary to win.
I don't even know really how he has been tolerated to even get to candidate status. There were so many better options in the beginning but he bullied himself through it and now people who voted for him wished they had not.
I didn't vote at all because I was out of county on that day sleeping in an ICU waiting room but this election was a mess.
If he had a history treating men like objects and using them and supporting bad mouthing and such, he wouldn't be president right now. But oh, if its women, then we should all look past that. As my daddy would the man has no fiber. He has no integrity and it shows in every action he makes.
 
Back
Top