SO: Your Children Belong to Us

Re: Re: SO: Your Children Belong to Us

lotstodo said:
Madea said:
For the record, that psycho beotch can KMA! :rant And, yeah, I backspaced a few times and cleaned that up.
Ha, this thread has gotten so far off track I thought you were talking about the Princess :)

Me too. :cantbelievemyeyes Madea was about to have some 'splaining to do....
 
forum
 
Re: Re: SO: Your Children Belong to Us

LisaC said:
lotstodo said:
Madea said:
For the record, that psycho beotch can KMA! :rant And, yeah, I backspaced a few times and cleaned that up.
Ha, this thread has gotten so far off track I thought you were talking about the Princess :)

Me too. :cantbelievemyeyes Madea was about to have some 'splaining to do....

Chicky, I got my own princess to deal with. Homey don't dis princesses. :laugh
 
honeybunny said:
My child is my responsibility... I do not give a flying flip about the collective.

:ditto I used to have visions of shoving Hillary's "village" where, well, you know. 8)
 
Actually she may not be too far off from the truth, the "community" is already paying for many now and since it's paying for them they assume a level of ownership. That's not too far of a stretch.
 
J-man said:
Actually she may not be too far off from the truth, the "community" is already paying for many now and since it's paying for them they assume a level of ownership. That's not too far of a stretch.

You may be on to something! This may be why we are hearing about more incidents of people smacking other people's kids in public! Wait until I tell my crazy family that because their kids are part of my community, I get free reign to snatch a knot in some backsides when they get out of hand...
:laugh
 
LisaC said:
J-man said:
Actually she may not be too far off from the truth, the "community" is already paying for many now and since it's paying for them they assume a level of ownership. That's not too far of a stretch.

You may be on to something! This may be why we are hearing about more incidents of people smacking other people's kids in public! Wait until I tell my crazy family that because their kids are part of my community, I get free reign to snatch a knot in some backsides when they get out of hand...
:laugh

:))
 
ShoeDiva said:
LisaC said:
J-man said:
Actually she may not be too far off from the truth, the "community" is already paying for many now and since it's paying for them they assume a level of ownership. That's not too far of a stretch.

You may be on to something! This may be why we are hearing about more incidents of people smacking other people's kids in public! Wait until I tell my crazy family that because their kids are part of my community, I get free reign to snatch a knot in some backsides when they get out of hand...
:laugh

:))

By the way, YOUR princess's picture CD came in the mail yesterday...
 
LisaC said:
ShoeDiva said:
LisaC said:
J-man said:
Actually she may not be too far off from the truth, the "community" is already paying for many now and since it's paying for them they assume a level of ownership. That's not too far of a stretch.

You may be on to something! This may be why we are hearing about more incidents of people smacking other people's kids in public! Wait until I tell my crazy family that because their kids are part of my community, I get free reign to snatch a knot in some backsides when they get out of hand...
:laugh

:))

By the way, YOUR princess's picture CD came in the mail yesterday...

:cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 How gorgeous are the pictures? Though I am not sure there could be any better than the one you have as your profile one now.
 
ShoeDiva said:
LisaC said:
ShoeDiva said:
LisaC said:
J-man said:
Actually she may not be too far off from the truth, the "community" is already paying for many now and since it's paying for them they assume a level of ownership. That's not too far of a stretch.

You may be on to something! This may be why we are hearing about more incidents of people smacking other people's kids in public! Wait until I tell my crazy family that because their kids are part of my community, I get free reign to snatch a knot in some backsides when they get out of hand...
:laugh

:))

By the way, YOUR princess's picture CD came in the mail yesterday...

:cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 How gorgeous are the pictures? Though I am not sure there could be any better than the one you have as your profile one now.

I will post - I want to turn one of them into a black/white shot, but I definitely want to get them printed and maybe do a little collage of these and some of the ones of her with the girls to go in her room.
 
LisaC said:
ShoeDiva said:
LisaC said:
ShoeDiva said:
LisaC said:
J-man said:
Actually she may not be too far off from the truth, the "community" is already paying for many now and since it's paying for them they assume a level of ownership. That's not too far of a stretch.

You may be on to something! This may be why we are hearing about more incidents of people smacking other people's kids in public! Wait until I tell my crazy family that because their kids are part of my community, I get free reign to snatch a knot in some backsides when they get out of hand...
:laugh

:))

By the way, YOUR princess's picture CD came in the mail yesterday...

:cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 How gorgeous are the pictures? Though I am not sure there could be any better than the one you have as your profile one now.

I will post - I want to turn one of them into a black/white shot, but I definitely want to get them printed and maybe do a little collage of these and some of the ones of her with the girls to go in her room.

GREAT idea!
 
Unfortunately, people like this and Rush Limbaugh turn the issue black and white when it isn't. For example, the collective builds schools for the children. I have no kids, but I'm expected to help fund the school anyway. On the other hand, I can't tell a kid who is running around in a restaurant and crashes into my table to get himself under control (true story and very angry mother).

The answer belongs in that mushy gray area in the middle. We all need to look out for each others' kids to some extent. However, there is a blurry line between "collective" and "parent responsibility". There are some areas into which a non-parent should not intrude. There are also times the collective should say, "You are not a suitable parent for this child" and take the child away from the parent.

Short answer: Rush and this woman are extremists trying to make it black and white so they can get attention. The real world is gray and sometimes doesn't have clear cut answers.
 
Communists and fascists have ever known that the key to long-term success is brainwashing the children. cf. Hitler Youth, Cuba's Jose' Marti' Pioneers, et al.
 
There are only two "Human Rights". You have exclusive rights to yourself and the fruits of your labor. Period, end quote. You do not have any rights to the fruits of another's labor. They may elect to share what they earned with you, but you nor your government may take it without consent. That includes, food, education, housing, healthcare, retirement , a job, or anything else the collective needs you to believe can be rightfully stolen from those who worked for it.
 
lotstodo said:
There are only two "Human Rights". You have exclusive rights to yourself and the fruits of your labor. Period, end quote. You do not have any rights to the fruits of another's labor. They may elect to share what they earned with you, but you nor your government may take it without consent. That includes, food, education, housing, healthcare, retirement , a job, or anything else the collective needs you to believe can be rightfully stolen from those who worked for it.

Except that you give the Lord the first fruits, then the rest is yours.
 
LisaC said:
lotstodo said:
There are only two "Human Rights". You have exclusive rights to yourself and the fruits of your labor. Period, end quote. You do not have any rights to the fruits of another's labor. They may elect to share what they earned with you, but you nor your government may take it without consent. That includes, food, education, housing, healthcare, retirement , a job, or anything else the collective needs you to believe can be rightfully stolen from those who worked for it.

Except that you give the Lord the first fruits, then the rest is yours.
You may give them to whomever or whatever you wish.
 
lotstodo said:
LisaC said:
lotstodo said:
There are only two "Human Rights". You have exclusive rights to yourself and the fruits of your labor. Period, end quote. You do not have any rights to the fruits of another's labor. They may elect to share what they earned with you, but you nor your government may take it without consent. That includes, food, education, housing, healthcare, retirement , a job, or anything else the collective needs you to believe can be rightfully stolen from those who worked for it.

Except that you give the Lord the first fruits, then the rest is yours.
You may give them to whomever or whatever you wish.



I will let the conservatives deal with you on that one - I'm too liberal to properly respond.



Actually, I think I have an idea for a s/o and you know how I love those!!! Thanks!
:cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1
 
Back
Top