Sign Stealers...

[honeybunny]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

The fact is that some of the "powers that be" do not want a fair contest of candidates,
and have resorted to some very unsavory tactics regarding sign placement in this race.


:whistle

 

[ShoeDiva]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

The fact is that some of the "powers that be" do not want a fair contest of candidates,
and have resorted to some very unsavory tactics regarding sign placement in this race.


:whistle

Really? That is a fact?

If they did not "want" certain candidates why is there only one republican running in Post 2, one that has not been agreeable to what they want, and not one of their "choice" on the ballot? I would think that if they are up to things that would have been a good place to start seeing that the airport is in that Post.

I am just SMH at some of the things I have read and heard over the last few months. I can not wait for the airport and these races to be decided. I am at the point I just do not even care if we get commercial, don't get commercial, or if Billy Bob wins or loses. I am tired of the people that "know" everything, insinuate much, and have been just ugly regarding who is doing what and the reason of why behind it. Glass houses and such.

 

[PCGOPExaminer]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

The fact is that some of the "powers that be" do not want a fair contest of candidates,
and have resorted to some very unsavory tactics regarding sign placement in this race.


:whistle

That is correct, HB and there is more.

 

[honeybunny]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

The fact is that some of the "powers that be" do not want a fair contest of candidates,
and have resorted to some very unsavory tactics regarding sign placement in this race.


:whistle

Really? That is a fact?

If they did not "want" certain candidates why is there only one republican running in Post 2, one that has not been agreeable to what they want, and not one of their "choice" on the ballot? I would think that if they are up to things that would have been a good place to start seeing that the airport is in that Post.

I am just SMH at some of the things I have read and heard over the last few months. I can not wait for the airport and these races to be decided. I am at the point I just do not even care if we get commercial, don't get commercial, or if Billy Bob wins or loses. I am tired of the people that "know" everything, insinuate much, and have been just ugly regarding who is doing what and the reason of why behind it. Glass houses and such.

Yes, it is a fact that I know firsthand.

I've not been ugly, I do not throw stones, and my house is not constructed of glass.

I am willing to stand up and cry "foul" when I see wrongdoing by our connected officials.

 

[ShoeDiva]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

The fact is that some of the "powers that be" do not want a fair contest of candidates,
and have resorted to some very unsavory tactics regarding sign placement in this race.


:whistle

Really? That is a fact?

If they did not "want" certain candidates why is there only one republican running in Post 2, one that has not been agreeable to what they want, and not one of their "choice" on the ballot? I would think that if they are up to things that would have been a good place to start seeing that the airport is in that Post.

I am just SMH at some of the things I have read and heard over the last few months. I can not wait for the airport and these races to be decided. I am at the point I just do not even care if we get commercial, don't get commercial, or if Billy Bob wins or loses. I am tired of the people that "know" everything, insinuate much, and have been just ugly regarding who is doing what and the reason of why behind it. Glass houses and such.

Yes, it is a fact that I know firsthand.

I've not been ugly, I do not throw stones, and my house is not constructed of glass.

I am willing to stand up and cry "foul" when I see wrongdoing by our connected officials.

I am sorry if you thought I meant you have been ugly, I did not. BUT I have a hard time believing that anyone knows that it is a fact that signs have been moved because they do not want a fair contest. I believe that there has been much stated that can lead one to believe certain things, but when people say that something is a fact I tend to not believe it when it comes to intention or wants. It is very hard to know what someone wants or intends without them actually stating it and I am pretty sure no one has stated that they do not want a fair race. JMO

What about what I asked for Post 2? No way can anyone but Pownell win, he is the only republican on the ticket, if they wanted unfair would they have had another person run and go all in with campaigning? Pownell has been far from their biggest cheerleader and yet they did not look for another to replace him.

 

[honeybunny]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

The fact is that some of the "powers that be" do not want a fair contest of candidates,
and have resorted to some very unsavory tactics regarding sign placement in this race.


:whistle

Really? That is a fact?

If they did not "want" certain candidates why is there only one republican running in Post 2, one that has not been agreeable to what they want, and not one of their "choice" on the ballot? I would think that if they are up to things that would have been a good place to start seeing that the airport is in that Post.

I am just SMH at some of the things I have read and heard over the last few months. I can not wait for the airport and these races to be decided. I am at the point I just do not even care if we get commercial, don't get commercial, or if Billy Bob wins or loses. I am tired of the people that "know" everything, insinuate much, and have been just ugly regarding who is doing what and the reason of why behind it. Glass houses and such.

Yes, it is a fact that I know firsthand.

I've not been ugly, I do not throw stones, and my house is not constructed of glass.

I am willing to stand up and cry "foul" when I see wrongdoing by our connected officials.

I am sorry if you thought I meant you have been ugly, I did not. BUT I have a hard time believing that anyone knows that it is a fact that signs have been moved because they do not want a fair contest. I believe that there has been much stated that can lead one to believe certain things, but when people say that something is a fact I tend to not believe it when it comes to intention or wants. It is very hard to know what someone wants or intends without them actually stating it and I am pretty sure no one has stated that they do not want a fair race. JMO

What about what I asked for Post 2? No way can anyone but Pownell win, he is the only republican on the ticket, if they wanted unfair would they have had another person run and go all in with campaigning? Pownell has been far from their biggest cheerleader and yet they did not look for another to replace him.

No need to replace Pownall when you can simply marginalize him.

 

[naturegirl]

Got two phone calls this morning about the Marshall's demanding signs be moved or they would be taken away. Every single one of them was well within the 150 feet of the Polling Place.

Needless to say, there are quite a few furious voters and candidates, the registrar's has been notified. Someone is definitely wanting to change the rules.

 

[honeybunny]

Got two phone calls this morning about the Marshall's demanding signs be moved or they would be taken away. Every single one of them was well within the 150 feet of the Polling Place.

Needless to say, there are quite a few furious voters and candidates, the registrar's has been notified. Someone is definitely wanting to change the rules.

My "new" sign still stands as of now, but we did notice some missing from the High Shoals area this morning.

I was happy to see the smiling Crowe crew out in front of the polling place this morning... GO TONY GO ! ! !



:cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1 :cheer1

 

[Boss 302]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

First off, you do not know me and you have zero knowledge of what I know. Furthermore, it isn't about "my" candidate(s), it is about ethics and playing fair on all levels. There is a reason why I do not post certain things on public boards. I guess you have not figured that out yet.

You're a short fella, with balding hair, and you wear glasses. Correct?

In every political race, all candidates get their signs stolen. It's a fact of life.

 

[stradial]

What you all are seeing, is correct. Ethics mean nothing to some in this county.

What does ethics have to do with picking up different signs? Not just one candidate was targeted, at least not with what I saw.

There's more than meets the eye that is going on. I just cannot say publicly and yes, unethical tactics have been in play in various ways.

I've noticed quite often when it comes to local politics, you come here and say there's a lot you know that we don't, but you can't say anything about it in public. I learned a long time ago people usually do this often have an agenda and really don't know anymore than the rest of us. In this case I think it's you want to believe your candidate has been singled out and his signs are being stolen by his opponent. The fact is your candidate and his opponent's signs are being removed.

First off, you do not know me and you have zero knowledge of what I know. Furthermore, it isn't about "my" candidate(s), it is about ethics and playing fair on all levels. There is a reason why I do not post certain things on public boards. I guess you have not figured that out yet.

You're a short fella, with balding hair, and you wear glasses. Correct?

Uhhhh, that's me.

 

[honeybunny]

Uh oh... time for shenanigans :


http://ponytailpatriot.com/section-blog/242-election-day-shenanigans-in-paulding


oke2

 

[ShoeDiva]

Uh oh... time for shenanigans :


http://ponytailpatriot.com/section-blog/242-election-day-shenanigans-in-paulding


oke2

I was totally with Candi until her last sentence. Seriously, I hope she can back up that line.

FTR Reporting any kind of problem is the correct thing to do.