Part of what Abrams is suing over was a Democrat backed initiative
- Thread starter Guard Dad
- Start date
JawJa
Driving Instructor
Sooo...
It would seem that Ms Abrams wants to do...
Is stir the pot... and create more confusion, so more 'favourable' ballots can be magically 'found' after the election is over.
I see nothing wrong with the law in the link... other than the lack of a clear and non-negotiable requirement for a picture ID!
And of course ONLY legal citizens can vote!
I suspect if one were to listen to Ms Abrams in private...
They would hear contempt for honest elections.
It would seem that Ms Abrams wants to do...
Is stir the pot... and create more confusion, so more 'favourable' ballots can be magically 'found' after the election is over.
I see nothing wrong with the law in the link... other than the lack of a clear and non-negotiable requirement for a picture ID!
And of course ONLY legal citizens can vote!
I suspect if one were to listen to Ms Abrams in private...
They would hear contempt for honest elections.
Far West
Pursuit Driver
I know of two conservative voters who were taken off the rolls. One had not voted, for several years. Then the year 0bama was up for his second term, his family told him he had to go vote, that it was important that year. When he got to the polls, he was told since he had not been voting for years he had been removed.
Another conservative voter moved out of state, but had kept voting absentee ballot from the address of the house she still owned and her family was still living in. After the third year the registrar of voters sent information that she had to re-register since she had not voted in person and the ballot had been being sent out of state to her to vote for too many years.
The law worked as it was intended. They both had to re-register if they wanted to vote.
It was not on the news that they were disenfranchised. They had to play by the rules and re-register. No big surprise or outrage.
Another conservative voter moved out of state, but had kept voting absentee ballot from the address of the house she still owned and her family was still living in. After the third year the registrar of voters sent information that she had to re-register since she had not voted in person and the ballot had been being sent out of state to her to vote for too many years.
The law worked as it was intended. They both had to re-register if they wanted to vote.
It was not on the news that they were disenfranchised. They had to play by the rules and re-register. No big surprise or outrage.
JawJa
Driving Instructor
IMO...
The Sec/State office needs to severly limit any and all voting other than on election day.
And then extend election day to Monday and Tuesday... Or possibly like some foreign countries where it is Saturday & Sunday.
The goal (IMO) would be to make the largest reasonable majority of cast votes... be cast AT THE POLES, IN PERSON... and of course, with a picture ID!
The less votes cast other than in person at the polls... the less chance for fraud.
Keeping the Sec/State office in the hands of honest folks (as honest as can be expected from polecats, as opposed to down right criminals)...
Will help to limit voter fraud.
And with the purchase of new voting equipment coming before the next election... we REALLY need honesty in govt!
The Sec/State office needs to severly limit any and all voting other than on election day.
And then extend election day to Monday and Tuesday... Or possibly like some foreign countries where it is Saturday & Sunday.
The goal (IMO) would be to make the largest reasonable majority of cast votes... be cast AT THE POLES, IN PERSON... and of course, with a picture ID!
The less votes cast other than in person at the polls... the less chance for fraud.
Keeping the Sec/State office in the hands of honest folks (as honest as can be expected from polecats, as opposed to down right criminals)...
Will help to limit voter fraud.
And with the purchase of new voting equipment coming before the next election... we REALLY need honesty in govt!