I'm Floored said:I'm right there with ya! And I'm probably ticking off all my "moderate" friends. Oh, well. Maybe they'll educate themselves and realize what a terrible decision this was for our country!
Foxmeister said:I don't think the moderates will be very happy with this ruling.
They have a point. My hope is that he honors "repeal and replace" and acknowledges the work of Dr. Coburn.ShoeDiva said:I have seen many posts from my democratic friends stating things, "if you hate obamacare so much the alternative is to vote in Romney where he had it in his state? How do you justify that vote?"
I know they do. My reason for no response.lotstodo said:They have a point. My hope is that he honors "repeal and replace" and acknowledges the work of Dr. Coburn.ShoeDiva said:I have seen many posts from my democratic friends stating things, "if you hate obamacare so much the alternative is to vote in Romney where he had it in his state? How do you justify that vote?"
ShoeDiva said:I have seen many posts from my democratic friends stating things, "if you hate obamacare so much the alternative is to vote in Romney where he had it in his state? How do you justify that vote?"
Foxmeister said:I looked at the discussion on this subject at the other site. It appears the majority are angry over the decision by the SCOTUS. A few say this will be the first time they vote Republican.
Foxmeister said:I looked at the discussion on this subject at the other site. It appears the majority are angry over the decision by the SCOTUS. A few say this will be the first time they vote Republican.
Foxmeister said:I looked at the discussion on this subject at the other site. It appears the majority are angry over the decision by the SCOTUS. A few say this will be the first time they vote Republican.
ShoeDiva said:I have seen many posts from my democratic friends stating things, "if you hate obamacare so much the alternative is to vote in Romney where he had it in his state? How do you justify that vote?"
It is my understanding that Mitt did not really want the healthcare plan in Mass. but the people did. He gave them what they wanted. He worked for the people. I hope he will do the same when he is President. "We The People" should still mean something.ShoeDiva said:I have seen many posts from my democratic friends stating things, "if you hate obamacare so much the alternative is to vote in Romney where he had it in his state? How do you justify that vote?"
That's the crux of the question right there. It is constitutional for the government to levy a tax for the purpose of transfer payments, like it or not. It is NOT constitutional for the government to mandate that a private citizen purchase a product from another private citizen, particularly if that product originates within the state of residence (all insurance companies are currently state licensed, not federally licensed).Genevieve said:I know. I'm shocked and saddened. It's constitutional because it's a tax? ??? What is up with that?