What Really Happened in Benghazi

Guard Dad

Administrator
Staff member
This was written by an old friend of mine who is a retired Navy Seal instructor. He knows what he's talking about.





The biggest stench from the Benghazi fiasco is that it is beginning to smell like Obama went "nighty-night" to rest up for Las Vegas, instead of manning up in the Situation Room and seeing the crisis through and (had he only been awake) ordering a rescue mission.

In Benghazi, after 6-8 hours enduring a few “Fort Apaches,” with running street battles in between, (like a mini Blackhawk Down), the living Americans must have been thinking, “Any minute now, here come the helicopters! Just hang on!”

But they didn’t. So even though Delta had forward staged to Sigonella Sicily (rumint) from base in Germany, nobody was willing or able to pull the trigger and send a rescue force. Or even a few F-18 supersonic flybys, to bust windows and warn, “Here comes American airpower, and you camel jockeys know what that means.” Just as a morale booster it would have helped the besieged staffers.

But it was never sent, not even a lousy supersonic low-level flyby. One hour from bases in Italy, max.

Here is the deal. The military automatically does a lot on its own, under standing orders and SOPs. The minute they see that the consulate is under attack, and the ambassador and others are in a "safe room" hiding, it becomes TOP priority. Every other mission aborts or slaves over to support any possible rescue.

At that moment when the critical incident alarm messages start ringing, military steps happen on autopilot in real time. Everybody in the Navy and USAF chain of command swings into a crisis contingency plan mode. What ships are closest? Helicopters? Marines? Delta is in Germany? Get them moving right now. Where is closest? Sigonella, for now. It’s NATO, no permission needed, just fly.

En route in C-17s, the D-boys would even be prepping for an immediate action rescue mission, that is, the C-17s will fly directly to some desert road outside of Benghazi, and here comes “The Raid On Entebbe,” done in crisis mode, canned actions, but they would do it. They practice for these exact scenarios, and leave gear staged for them.

They would coordinate with fighters out of Italy, mid-air-refueling platforms start shifting, it's a huge show that swings into action for thousands of miles around Behghazi. The ongoing consulate attack is JOB ONE, the only job. VIPs will be tossed off of planes at remote runways if they need that platform.

Or Marines on amphibious ships in the central Med, (if any were available), would also be put on the real-time options board. We used to have a "Amphibious Ready Group" of about 3-5 USN gator freighters, including a helo carrier like a Tarawa class. They carry an entire battalion of USMC, plus SEALs etc, with helos and Ospreys to carry them all. (But not at once.) Where was our ARG? Does our Navy have enough ships for that mission any more?

But while all of that military staging would have happened/did happen during the 6-8 hour battle at the consulate and annex, what the military cannot do on their own say-so is cross an international border without an order from the NCA, the National Command Authority, and that means POTUS, Obama.

Only POTUS can authorize a cross-border hostile mission. That is, guns clear, no official permission from the Tripoli govt (if it really exists outside State Dept fantasies.)

Only one man can pull that trigger and say, "GO!" Obama.

(But for America to act "unilaterally" would have meant the bogus Libyan Arab Spring and so-called new Libyan Unity Govt. that we were propping up didn’t really exist. Libyan sovereignty must be held sacrosanct, even the false image of one, where in reality, Al Queda is top dog in Libya. Even when an Al Queda offshoot is your external "security," namely, "The 17th of February Martyrs Brigade." IOW, the White House thought they had a "deal" with AQ in Behghazi, since we were helping to run weaponry from Libya to their pals in Syria. So there was an "institutional bias" at State against crossing the border on a rescue operation sin permisso.)

Anyway, be that as it may, no General or Admiral will order the Marines ashore, or a Delta raid or even an F-18 or F-16 low-level supersonic flyby. They can not and will not cross a border without a clear-cut order from POTUS via the NCA. Not even Hillary can make that decision. Only Obama.

But no order came, as of midnight in DC. And then none would come. Because the POTUS retired for the night with a “do not disturb” sign on his door, punted, and went to bed, to be well rested for Las Vegas.

While his ambassador was off the U.S. radar, missing, at that moment possibly being dragged down a Benghazi street or even raped. But that is when Obama went to bed. Midnight in DC is 0600 in Beghazi.

That is the greatest scandal of Benghazi. The POTUS slept through it, while all around the world, military forces were poised for the Raid on Entebbe or any other damn thing the POTUS ordered them to do. (And the were raring to go, believe me.)

But the POTUS said, “We’ll discuss it further in the morning,” and then he went to bed around midnight in DC, 0600 in Benghazi, with a missing ambassador and a full-blown crisis in full mega flap.

He punted. He went to bed. God help us.

I think that’s the big secret they are keeping. The President went to bed, with his lost Ambassador being dragged through streets.

Obama went to bed.
 
I alternate between rage and extreme sadness at this situation. Right now, I'm LIVID! (Geraldo Rivera on Fox & Friends this morning helped to stir that!)

Your friend is very intelligent and is obviously well informed.
 
The CIA is now releasing information stating they sent a team of 6 in during the attack about 25 minutes after it started. They're now also claiming the sent more from the embassy in Tripoli, but they were held up at the airport after arriving in Benghazi. I actually think this information they are putting out is bogus and an attempt to cover up for the administration. If this were true, they would have released the info long ago.
 
"Sending" the initial team sort of jives with the story that there were a few who said screw you and went anyway. I guess if they were not shot for insubordination on sight, the CIA can claim credit for their good deeds and claim they were "sent". As for the airport hold-up, that doesn't even make for a good lie. Soldiers with weapons don't get "held up" at an airport in a virtual war zone. What, they didn't have their baggage claim tags? It's right up there with my dog ate my homework.
 
It appears that there are more than one seal taking credit for this piece now. Regardless, I have known the guy I got it from for over 30 years and trust him completely.
 
lotstodo said:
"Sending" the initial team sort of jives with the story that there were a few who said screw you and went anyway. I guess if they were not shot for insubordination on sight, the CIA can claim credit for their good deeds and claim they were "sent". As for the airport hold-up, that doesn't even make for a good lie. Soldiers with weapons don't get "held up" at an airport in a virtual war zone. What, they didn't have their baggage claim tags? It's right up there with my dog ate my homework.

I agree with you. Had the CIA really sent those guys in, the administration would have said that right afterward.
 
It's getting better. British intelligence sources on the ground that night are saying that the CIA story is only "loosely based on the truth". They also claim that they had security forces available in Bengazi that were never called upon, and they were not made aware of the seriousness of the attack until much later. They also say that armed drones were in flight over nearby weapons areas but were never dispatched to the embassy or the CIA compound. Instead a drone with only a camera was used.

Private security sources (Blue Mountain Security) on the ground that day also claim that the CIA time line is bogus. They claim that very early that morning they themselves also notified the CIA and State Department that heavily armed organized militia were setting up roadblocks and apparently staging for an attack on the embassy. They requested immediate help.
 
This whole story has the entire administration's fingerprints all over it. There should be multiple people going to prison over this!
 
lotstodo said:
It's getting better. British intelligence sources on the ground that night are saying that the CIA story is only "loosely based on the truth". They also claim that they had security forces available in Bengazi that were never called upon, and they were not made aware of the seriousness of the attack until much later. They also say that armed drones were in flight over nearby weapons areas but were never dispatched to the embassy or the CIA compound. Instead a drone with only a camera was used.

Private security sources (Blue Mountain Security) on the ground that day also claim that the CIA time line is bogus. They claim that very early that morning they themselves also notified the CIA and State Department that heavily armed organized militia were setting up roadblocks and apparently staging for an attack on the embassy. They requested immediate help.

I think the CIA timeline on this is bogus as well. I believe the CIA team of six that did respond, did so after they were told not to. The CIA came out with this timeline in an effort to cover their own tails and the administration. They knew they could not take any disciplinary action against these men because doing so would have come back and hurt the CIA and administration more as it would have made the coverup even more apparent.

Even if the timeline were true, it still negates the fact there was no action taken to beef up security at the consulate though several smaller attacks had occurred within months before the attack resulting in the death of the ambassador and other personnel. The prior attacks and the intelligence reporting all indicated a major attack was coming. If the administration was not going to beef up security, they should have vacated all personnel, equipment and documents to the embassy in Tripoli. Even with that move, extra security precautions would have been necessary at the embassy.

Either Obama didn't care about the events leading up to the attacks because he didn't attend his daily security briefings or he passed the responsibility off to someone who didn't know how to manage the problem. Either way, the ultimate responsibility falls upon his shoulders as he is the POTUS.
 
MI6 and Mossad told us that the danger was extreme, and Stevens clearly knew that from the cables he sent to Foggy Bottom. The Brits pulled their ambassador out the week before. We'd probably keel over in a dead faint if we knew what they know.
 
Back
Top