Trump 2024

Maybe you're right but it's a long way until November and I don't think we've even begun to see some of the crazy stuff that will likely happen between now and then. Lawsuits, convictions, Newsom, Obama....who knows.
Oh, I have no doubt the left will throw everything they can at him.

But one advantage Trump has is that most of it is likely to have no effect. They've already tried every trick in the book and wrote some new ones; no one will be surprised at much else they try. At this point, people just roll their eyes at new dirty tricks.

As for substitute candidates...Manchin is the one that concerns me. If the Dems can bring themselves to run him, he would likely win.
 
But one advantage Trump has is that most of it is likely to have no effect. They've already tried every trick in the book and wrote some new ones; no one will be surprised at much else they try. At this point, people just roll their eyes at new dirty tricks.

There are polls that show lots of people that won't vote for Trump if he is convicted.
 
There are polls that show lots of people that won't vote for Trump if he is convicted.
I suspect a lot of that is in how the question is asked. The left wants us to believe that.

Regardless, a conviction prior to the election is looking less likely.
 
Trump claims Swift needs to be loyal to him because he made her millions of dollars. “There’s no way she could endorse Crooked Joe Biden, the worst and most corrupt President in the History of our Country, and be disloyal to the man who made her so much money. Besides that, I like her boyfriend, Travis, even though he may be a Liberal, and probably can’t stand me!”
 
Trump claims Swift needs to be loyal to him because he made her millions of dollars. “There’s no way she could endorse Crooked Joe Biden, the worst and most corrupt President in the History of our Country, and be disloyal to the man who made her so much money. Besides that, I like her boyfriend, Travis, even though he may be a Liberal, and probably can’t stand me!”
Judge Judy Eye Roll GIF
 
If a country isn’t paid up on their “NATO Dues” are they actually in NATO and should they be? It’s like the dreaded Timeshare Maintenance fee which seems to increase yearly, either pay it current or lose access to service.
 
Trump said because they didn't pay their dues, he would encourage Russia to do to them whatever they were going to do. Ukraine is not a NATO country, and Trump has said during this election campaign he could have peace established between Ukraine and Russia in 24 hours after becoming president. How?

Most likely he would tell Ukraine to give up the eastern section of its country to Russia. If not, he would drop all aid to them and encourage Russia to do whatever he wanted to them.
 
Trump said because they didn't pay their dues, he would encourage Russia to do to them whatever they were going to do. Ukraine is not a NATO country, and Trump has said during this election campaign he could have peace established between Ukraine and Russia in 24 hours after becoming president. How?

Most likely he would tell Ukraine to give up the eastern section of its country to Russia. If not, he would drop all aid to them and encourage Russia to do whatever he wanted to them.
Why should we worry about Ukraine's borders, yet not worry about Texas, Arizona, New Mexico & California's borders?
 
Trump said because they didn't pay their dues, he would encourage Russia to do to them whatever they were going to do. Ukraine is not a NATO country, and Trump has said during this election campaign he could have peace established between Ukraine and Russia in 24 hours after becoming president. How?

Most likely he would tell Ukraine to give up the eastern section of its country to Russia. If not, he would drop all aid to them and encourage Russia to do whatever he wanted to them.
I know what Trump said, I was just pointing out that if countries are in arrears of their financial obligation as a NATO member why should they be defended by NATO. Sounds like a typical Democratic program.
 
Here's Article 5 of the NATO Agreement

Article 5​

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
 
I'm still looking for the article pertaining to paying the annual dues to continue being a club member? Try buying something at Sam's or Costco without paying the annual membership fee.
 
Back
Top