Manhattan to Stop Prosecuting Prostitution

The Sound Guy

Pursuit Driver
The Manhattan district attorney’s office announced Wednesday that it would no longer prosecute prostitution and unlicensed massage, putting the weight of one of the most high-profile law enforcement offices in the United States behind the growing movement to change the criminal justice system’s approach to sex work.

The district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., revealed the new policy as he appeared virtually in court to ask a judge to dismiss 914 open cases involving prostitution and unlicensed massage, along with 5,080 cases in which the charge was loitering for the purposes of prostitution.

The law that made the latter charge a crime, which had become known as the “walking while trans” law, was repealed by New York State in February.

Mr. Vance said that with the announcement, his office had fully shifted its approach to prostitution. Many of the cases he moved to dismiss dated to the 1970s and 1980s, when New York waged a war against prostitution in an effort to clean up its image as a center of iniquity and vice.

“Over the last decade we’ve learned from those with lived experience, and from our own experience on the ground: Criminally prosecuting prostitution does not make us safer, and too often, achieves the opposite result by further marginalizing vulnerable New Yorkers,” Mr. Vance said in a statement.

The office will continue to prosecute other crimes related to prostitution, including patronizing sex workers and sex trafficking.

Manhattan will join Baltimore, Philadelphia and other jurisdictions that have declined to prosecute sex workers. Brooklyn also does not prosecute people arrested for prostitution, but instead refers them to social services before they are compelled to appear in court — unless the district attorney’s office there is unable to reach them.

<SNIP>

In New York City, those calls have grown louder. Last month, Mayor Bill de Blasio and his wife, Chirlane McCray, called on the state to end criminal penalties for sex workers.
“The communities hit hardest by the continued criminalization of sex work and human trafficking are overwhelmingly LGBTQ, they are people of color, and they are undocumented immigrants,” Ms. McCray said at the time. “Sex work is a means of survival for many in these marginalized groups.

*******
Really? Prosecute the customers, but not the provider. Then claim that all these people that the libs support have no worthy skills to make a living but to sell their bodies. Hmmm... do those people not see that comment for the insult it is?

The ship has sunk, hit bottom and been smashed into little pieces.
 
[.....are overwhelmingly LGBTQ, they are people of color, and they are undocumented immigrants]

Welcome to the new mantra.

(One can't even share a chocolate-chip cookie recipe now without being accused of something.)

Have you listened to NPR lately (it's your tax money) - Everything (and I mean "Everything") is about race and/or sexual orientation.

The only exception to this is Climate Change..... and it's all your fault, all of it.
 
If prostitution is not going to be enforced in Manhattan, it will also reduce human trafficking investigations. A large percentage of human trafficking investigations are a result of enforcing prostitution laws.
 
They'll soon be stacking up dead hookers like cord wood! One of the things that kept the psychos out of that hood is the fear of being arrested, and now that no one is looking, they will do their thing.
 
The Manhattan district attorney’s office announced Wednesday that it would no longer prosecute prostitution and unlicensed massage, putting the weight of one of the most high-profile law enforcement offices in the United States behind the growing movement to change the criminal justice system’s approach to sex work.

The district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., revealed the new policy as he appeared virtually in court to ask a judge to dismiss 914 open cases involving prostitution and unlicensed massage, along with 5,080 cases in which the charge was loitering for the purposes of prostitution.

The law that made the latter charge a crime, which had become known as the “walking while trans” law, was repealed by New York State in February.

Mr. Vance said that with the announcement, his office had fully shifted its approach to prostitution. Many of the cases he moved to dismiss dated to the 1970s and 1980s, when New York waged a war against prostitution in an effort to clean up its image as a center of iniquity and vice.

“Over the last decade we’ve learned from those with lived experience, and from our own experience on the ground: Criminally prosecuting prostitution does not make us safer, and too often, achieves the opposite result by further marginalizing vulnerable New Yorkers,” Mr. Vance said in a statement.

The office will continue to prosecute other crimes related to prostitution, including patronizing sex workers and sex trafficking.

Manhattan will join Baltimore, Philadelphia and other jurisdictions that have declined to prosecute sex workers. Brooklyn also does not prosecute people arrested for prostitution, but instead refers them to social services before they are compelled to appear in court — unless the district attorney’s office there is unable to reach them.

<SNIP>

In New York City, those calls have grown louder. Last month, Mayor Bill de Blasio and his wife, Chirlane McCray, called on the state to end criminal penalties for sex workers.
“The communities hit hardest by the continued criminalization of sex work and human trafficking are overwhelmingly LGBTQ, they are people of color, and they are undocumented immigrants,” Ms. McCray said at the time. “Sex work is a means of survival for many in these marginalized groups.

*******
Really? Prosecute the customers, but not the provider. Then claim that all these people that the libs support have no worthy skills to make a living but to sell their bodies. Hmmm... do those people not see that comment for the insult it is?

The ship has sunk, hit bottom and been smashed into little pieces.
How about we don't prosecute anyone for prostitution and concentrate on prosecuting those who would force a woman to provide sex. That would be traffickers, bad pimps, and rapists.
 
How about we don't prosecute anyone for prostitution and concentrate on prosecuting those who would force a woman to provide sex. That would be traffickers, bad pimps, and rapists.

Agreed. If someone wants to pay someone else for sex and the two can agree on the conditions, I say have at it.
 
Back
Top