It's Barrett

"If Judge Barrett’s views become law, hundreds of millions of Americans living w/pre-existing conditions would lose access to their health care. In the middle of a pandemic, rushing confirmation of an extreme jurist who will decimate health care is unconscionable,"
Blumenthal said on Twitter. Does he have a crystal ball or something that allows him to see the future?

The Dems continue to show how pathetic and hypocritical they are.
 
120018403_643840893226262_5493908116294327152_o.jpg
 
I was watching the news late last night and one liberal stated he thought the Dems should look into her adoption of two black Haitian kids because many adoptions from there have been illegal.
 
I was watching the news late last night and one liberal stated he thought the Dems should look into her adoption of two black Haitian kids because many adoptions from there have been illegal.
Saw that. How ugly can you get?

Maybe I shouldn't ask that.
 
I think she'll be a good justice. I would have gone with Lagoa; not just because she's a constitutionalist, but because she is also Cuban-American. The Dems would have done a lot of damage to themselves in Florida and elsewhere with Hispanics had they attacked her and you know they would have.
 
I think she'll be a good justice. I would have gone with Lagoa; not just because she's a constitutionalist, but because she is also Cuban-American. The Dems would have done a lot of damage to themselves in Florida and elsewhere with Hispanics had they attacked her and you know they would have.
She would have been the wisest political choice. I think Trump chose Barrett specifically as a thumb to the eye of Democrats.
 
She is an excellent choice. Agree the Cuban-American angle seems like good politics to me and I might have went that way but I don't know the behind the scenes reasons for his choice. I just don't see her getting confirmed before the election. Maybe before Trump goes out if he loses and the Senate holds but not before the election. My biggest concern with the office of POTUS has always been SCOTUS picks.
 
She is an excellent choice. Agree the Cuban-American angle seems like good politics to me and I might have went that way but I don't know the behind the scenes reasons for his choice. I just don't see her getting confirmed before the election. Maybe before Trump goes out if he loses and the Senate holds but not before the election. My biggest concern with the office of POTUS has always been SCOTUS picks.
Right now, I'd take the SCOTUS pick and trade the Presidency for holding the Senate. I'm really afraid the Republicans could lose the whole thing, and then Obamacare will look like penny pinching. Say hello to the Green New Deal.
 
Right now, I'd take the SCOTUS pick and trade the Presidency for holding the Senate. I'm really afraid the Republicans could lose the whole thing, and then Obamacare will look like penny pinching. Say hello to the Green New Deal.
Can we all just pray for the Rapture?
 

I don't understand how Alaskans have kept this woman as their Senator. There has to be one person better than Murkowski that conservatives could convince to run against this idiot woman. She gives all women a bad name... Look at her comments below, what a jack waggon! What an idiot to vote no on the procedural motion. She's been there 18 years, almost 19, and she is an idiot!

Murkowski said she'll still vote "no" on the procedural motion on Sunday to advance Barrett's nomination. But when it comes to a final vote on Monday, the independent-minded Murkowski said she won't hold the process over a well-qualified nominee. She praised Barrett's temperament, legal writing and patience.

"I have concluded that she is the sort of person we want on the Supreme Court,
" Murkowski said.


THEN WHY VOTE NO ON THE PROCEDURAL MOTION YOU SACK OF S#IT ON A HOT DAY!
 
Back
Top