Tell me again which gender "he" is?

All I was pointing out is that it was not a disingenuous headline (for once) that they stated it was a trans man that had a baby. And you know, that is alright. I am not one to say who can and can not have children. ;):D
Right, God is. He decided that women would bear the children.

Which takes me back to my point...no matter what "he" identifies as or how many dealer installed options he buys; "he" is a female.
 
Right, God is. He decided that women would bear the children.

Which takes me back to my point...no matter what "he" identifies as or how many dealer installed options he buys; "he" is a female.
He knows that biologically he has female chromosomes and reproductive system. No one is arguing that point. :D
 
:confused: Ok, when you start making statements like that I am done responding. That does not even make a bit of sense.
The crudeness for effect, but aside from the surgeries, that's really what a transgender is. It is medically impossible to change one's gender.

Having said...I really give give a crap what people do as long as they can pay for it and it doesn't hurt anyone else. But this business about giving them special rights and accomdations is wrong, and some of it can and does hurt innocent people.

This whole transgender movement is nothing in the world but yet another emotional tactic by the Democratic Party.
 
drag queen
ˈdraɡ ˌkwēn/
noun
noun: drag queen; plural noun: drag queens
  1. a man who dresses up in women's clothes, typically for the purposes of entertainment.
 
I will add...it was the Democrats who caused this backlash against them too. The Dems pushed and pushed until good people pushed back against actions that they believed was wrong (using the wrong bathrooms, military, etc).
 
drag queen
ˈdraɡ ˌkwēn/
noun
noun: drag queen; plural noun: drag queens
  1. a man who dresses up in women's clothes, typically for the purposes of entertainment.
That pretty well covers it. Well, minus the entertainment part.
 
:confused: You do know we are talking about a woman that is transgendered/identifies as a man, right? Not a drag queen, a man that dresses as a woman mostly for entertainment.
Take out the entertainment factor, and what is the difference?
 
Take out the entertainment factor, and what is the difference?
Really? If at this point you do not understand the difference I do not know what to tell you.

This conversation is really going nowhere and is not productive. We have gone from a transgendered man, to drag queens, to Democrats being at fault. :cantbelieve:

I am going back to that these seems like good people, they have already adopted children that were going to be put into the foster system and now have a beautiful baby of their own. I am happy for them.
 
All I was pointing out is that it was not a disingenuous headline (for once) that they stated it was a trans man that had a baby. And you know, that is alright. I am not one to say who can and can not have children. ;):D
Correct. None of us can, only He can.
 
Back in the day a girl who dressed and thought of herself as a guy was called "butch" and a guy who dressed as a girl was a drag queen (no entertainment needed.) But, they both had two things in common, they didn't want kids, and they knew that they were male or female. No questions, no confusion.
But then back in the day seems like everyone KNEW exactly what their gender was, even if they were gay, or just crossdressers.
So a cross dressing FEMALE/WOMAN had a baby BOY. Big deal, that still doesn't mean that Lords of London is going to pay out the million dollars for the first MALE giving birth.

Edited to add: I will not support their delusions, no more then I would support my own family members delusions of grandeur, and climes of children he doesn't have. It doesn't help the mentally disturbed to play into their fantasies.
 
Last edited:
LOL

20525995_1402967939740807_8115798397450564117_n.jpg
 
Back
Top