Stephen Hawking dies aged 76

Far West

Pursuit Driver
He died peacefully at his home in Cambridge in the early hours of Wednesday, his family said.

The Briton was known for his work with black holes and relativity, and wrote several popular science books including A Brief History of Time.

At the age of 22 Prof Hawking was given only a few years to live after being diagnosed with a rare form of motor neurone disease.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43396008
 
“It would not be much of a universe if it wasn’t home to the people you love.” ~ Stephen Hawking
 
I find it more than curious that in my FB news feed today, I have so far seen nine posts questioning his non-belief in a supreme being and only five bemoaning the huge loss to mankind and the intellectual void that is the result of his death. It's as if there is great cheer that, in the opinion of the believer, he finally got what was coming to him. Science man rots in hell. It makes me quite sad.

Just as the Pope said that if science shows us that our beliefs are wrong, we must change our beliefs, Professor Hawking said that while there is no way to prove the absolute negative that there is no God, such would be a logical fallacy, there is nothing we have so far observed that would require his hand. Indeed Professor Hawking, as a scientist, never dealt in absolutes, only probabilities. There is a possibility that everything that could possibly ever happen is actually happening right now in the multiverse. There is a possibility that aliens will com down from space some day and give every person of Hispanic heritage who is less than 5 ft tall a complete butt check at precisely 4:03 PM. You can't prove that wrong. It's entirely possible, if also highly improbable. In the case of the existence of a God, when you die, you can't come back and tell us, and we can't conduct recorded exploration beyond our own death, therefore, God is still a belief. But as Professor Hawking has said, the evidence for that shows a low probability. His personal belief, which he stated as such, was that the brain is a biological computer that will simply shut down upon failure, and the vessel will return to it's basic elements. He never called it an absolute, only a belief. The absolute was that there is to date no discovered scientific evidence of God's hand in the universe.

Why would people mock such a man, an honest man, an intelligent man, a man of integrity, a man who fought his own battles every second of his life and still only dreamed of advancing our understanding. This is a man who had the uncanny ability to not only push the bleeding edge of scientific discovery and theoretical physics, but he could explain it to you and I also. He could explain it in a way that was logical, understandable, and exciting. He is the reason that hundreds of children chose science as a career path. He has influenced scientists, governments, and school children alike. Why would someone mock him over a belief? Because of his mortality, there are things we may not know. The universe has lost a champion.

If there is a God, may Hawking rest in peace. If there is not, the professor found the highest value in the living of his life, which he viewed as the greatest reward.
 
I hope Believers prayed that he equally reasoned spiritual probabilities. While admittedly he couldn't prove or disprove his scientific theories as absolutes neither could he his spiritual disbelief. I certainly hope there are no Christians mocking him or any other non-believer, that's just not very Christian in my book. Hawking was a great scientist and the science world will have its own black hole without him. May he rest in peace.
 
Too soon?

29177452_1797809730512890_7742002254135164928_n.jpg
 
I find it more than curious that in my FB news feed today, I have so far seen nine posts questioning his non-belief in a supreme being and only five bemoaning the huge loss to mankind and the intellectual void that is the result of his death. It's as if there is great cheer that, in the opinion of the believer, he finally got what was coming to him. Science man rots in hell. It makes me quite sad.

Just as the Pope said that if science shows us that our beliefs are wrong, we must change our beliefs, Professor Hawking said that while there is no way to prove the absolute negative that there is no God, such would be a logical fallacy, there is nothing we have so far observed that would require his hand. Indeed Professor Hawking, as a scientist, never dealt in absolutes, only probabilities. There is a possibility that everything that could possibly ever happen is actually happening right now in the multiverse. There is a possibility that aliens will com down from space some day and give every person of Hispanic heritage who is less than 5 ft tall a complete butt check at precisely 4:03 PM. You can't prove that wrong. It's entirely possible, if also highly improbable. In the case of the existence of a God, when you die, you can't come back and tell us, and we can't conduct recorded exploration beyond our own death, therefore, God is still a belief. But as Professor Hawking has said, the evidence for that shows a low probability. His personal belief, which he stated as such, was that the brain is a biological computer that will simply shut down upon failure, and the vessel will return to it's basic elements. He never called it an absolute, only a belief. The absolute was that there is to date no discovered scientific evidence of God's hand in the universe.

Why would people mock such a man, an honest man, an intelligent man, a man of integrity, a man who fought his own battles every second of his life and still only dreamed of advancing our understanding. This is a man who had the uncanny ability to not only push the bleeding edge of scientific discovery and theoretical physics, but he could explain it to you and I also. He could explain it in a way that was logical, understandable, and exciting. He is the reason that hundreds of children chose science as a career path. He has influenced scientists, governments, and school children alike. Why would someone mock him over a belief? Because of his mortality, there are things we may not know. The universe has lost a champion.

If there is a God, may Hawking rest in peace. If there is not, the professor found the highest value in the living of his life, which he viewed as the greatest reward.

I haven't seen posts "cheering" his departure, although there may be. I don't agree with that, but I did make a post stating that it was "sad", not funny, that Stephen is no longer an atheist. It's sad because I firmly believe it with all my heart. What is even more sad about the situation is quoted from your post, "there is nothing we have so far observed that would require his hand." I find it profoundly strange that a person who sees the majestic creation is not convinced by that alone that a Creator exists. Especially someone as smart as Stephen Hawkins. Now, I don't listen to the Pope, so I have no idea what he is talking about. But there is something seriously wrong if he believes that core beliefs about Heaven, Hell, the Cross and salvation by Grace should be altered in any fashion. And I don't recall Stephen H or any other scientist disproving that God exists. As you mentioned, everything is a theory to these people. Not like gravity that can be demonstrated.

Yes, Belief in God and his Son are a "belief" and "faith". Let us consider that God became tired of this whole thing and descended at halftime in the next Super Bowl. Tell me, who would doubt then? Who would not believe if He extended his hand and moved mountains or made himself a thousand feet tall in front of millions? In the time of Christ and shortly after his resurrection, Thomas doubted that Jesus truly rose from the dead and said, in summary, that he needed proof. He wanted to examine the hands of Jesus where they nailed him to the cross. Later Jesus met Thomas and said, "
“Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.”
Thomas replied, “My Lord and my God!” Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed;blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

Of course Thomas believed because Jesus gave him proof, but that is not faith which God wants us to have. We have not seen, yet we believe.

A simple acknowledgment of the "possibility" of God, without the acceptance of His invitation to be cleansed from sin by the blood of Christ is not sufficient to rescue a soul from hell. That is nothing I made up or pulled out of my hat, it is clearly stated in God's Word.

The world finds the preaching of the Gospel as foolishness, even God said that, but it is abundantly clear that so many who find offense with warnings about hell and eternity are bothered by a tugging deep in their soul. Yes, Hawking was a great mind and I'm certain a good man. but ALL of us have sinned and have fallen short of God's Glory. And we ALL need a Savior, even someone as smart as Stephen. My hope is that in his last hours, he felt that tug by the spirit of God and accepted Christ. If not, it is truly a sad day, but none of us made that decision for him....he did. Imagine the conversation Stephen and God could have had. All his theories and questions would have been answered.
 
I'm going to be nice and say that I did not interpret your FB post as you described it here. Not even close. But it wasn't the worst. If you indeed didn't mean to gloat then so be it. I'll leave it at that.

Now as to your definition of a scientific theory, it's wrong. A "theory" in the scientific sense is more complete than a "law" such as gravity. A law, as you say, is a direct observation (the sky is normally blue for instance). The theory is that it is blue because it absorbs light in other spectrums. That theory is proven by experimentation and mathematical analysis to the point where the statistical probability that the observation can be explained in any way other than the theory in question is one in 3.5 million. That is the minimum standard. I believe that Big Bang is something in the one in billions range. One could see only a sunset, and surmise that the sky is purple. Proof is more powerful and therefore more likely to be accurate than simple direct observation. In short, there is no such thing scientifically as "just" a theory. Theory is the gold standard of evidence based understanding. Theories do not become laws.
 
Not meaning to get in-between you guys, but I'll just weigh in on one thing.

When someone says that they don't believe in God, I totally respect that. They have the same right to not believe as I do to believe.

But to definitively say there is no God is not science. No one can disprove the existence of God any more than I can prove it.

A true mind of science will always be open to further possibilities. You guys know that I am both a Christian and a science-minded individual. And I am not at all conflicted over that.

I wish people would generally be more respectful of other's opinions and beliefs, even when they disagree.
 
One more, and I'll get down off my high horse. This isn't directed at anyone, honestly it isn't, it's just an observation. Specifically it is absolutely not aimed at GC, who has expressed what he meant above.

My friends IRL and on FB run about 3/4 Christian, a few of the Jewish religion, and a few believers of other faiths. Maybe a quarter or a little less are agnostic or atheist. One always hears how atheists are such A-holes, and certainly there are some well known loud mouths in the public space that fit the mold. However, when Billy Graham passed and was laid in state at the Capitol, only one of those supposedly amoral a-holes that I know said anything derogatory about that situation, or the man. Those others who said anything at all, were sorry to see a man who lived his life by serving others pass, and glad that he lived a long fruitful life. Of course this is just an observation based on a small sample. But my experience of the last few days makes me believe that some folks need to look in the mirror. Some people who I thought were kind-hearted and tolerant gravely disappointed me. There was no sadness in their posts or statements, no honor for a life well lived, or thanks for Hawking's massive contribution to the furtherance of science and understanding. It's not hateful to believe in hell, but it's hateful to claim any moral superiority over another human being because he passed away and according to your religion will spend his eternity there. It's intolerant, disrespectful, and precisely what I would expect from someone like Dawkins.

Now to the one person of true religion who has never let me down. My college roommate and lifelong friend, an extremely devout Catholic and the best person I know, was actually able to post an entire paragraph on Hawking's passing on FB without mentioning eternal damnation or the righteousness of his own personal belief. I am also quite certain that he took some time from Lent activities to pray for Professor Hawking and thank God for his life. That is the kind of Christian and person he is. That was what I, perhaps naively, expected from all my friends.

Sorry if I pissed anyone off. I had to get my disappointment off my chest.
 
One more, and I'll get down off my high horse. This isn't directed at anyone, honestly it isn't, it's just an observation. Specifically it is absolutely not aimed at GC, who has expressed what he meant above.

My friends IRL and on FB run about 3/4 Christian, a few of the Jewish religion, and a few believers of other faiths. Maybe a quarter or a little less are agnostic or atheist. One always hears how atheists are such A-holes, and certainly there are some well known loud mouths in the public space that fit the mold. However, when Billy Graham passed and was laid in state at the Capitol, only one of those supposedly amoral a-holes that I know said anything derogatory about that situation, or the man. Those others who said anything at all, were sorry to see a man who lived his life by serving others pass, and glad that he lived a long fruitful life. Of course this is just an observation based on a small sample. But my experience of the last few days makes me believe that some folks need to look in the mirror. Some people who I thought were kind-hearted and tolerant gravely disappointed me. There was no sadness in their posts or statements, no honor for a life well lived, or thanks for Hawking's massive contribution to the furtherance of science and understanding. It's not hateful to believe in hell, but it's hateful to claim any moral superiority over another human being because he passed away and according to your religion will spend his eternity there. It's intolerant, disrespectful, and precisely what I would expect from someone like Dawkins.

Now to the one person of true religion who has never let me down. My college roommate and lifelong friend, an extremely devout Catholic and the best person I know, was actually able to post an entire paragraph on Hawking's passing on FB without mentioning eternal damnation or the righteousness of his own personal belief. I am also quite certain that he took some time from Lent activities to pray for Professor Hawking and thank God for his life. That is the kind of Christian and person he is. That was what I, perhaps naively, expected from all my friends.

Sorry if I pissed anyone off. I had to get my disappointment off my chest.

I can speak for myself that you don't piss me off, but I must point out that not all comments are derogatory, at least not all that I have seen. And, to many of us, these statements about heaven and hell are not the equivalent of telling someone that they don't like their lifestyle or that they're ugly and their mother dresses them funny. It is the equivalent of not telling someone that THE BRIDGE IS OUT AHEAD because you are too ashamed to mention it or don't want to offend them.

I agree, some statements are made in the correct light and some are not, but it doesn't change the absolute danger that others are attempting to warn people about. And as you said about me, none of this is aimed at you personally. You are one of the few people I have ever met that can actually discuss and debate a matter civilly, especially one as sensitive as this one.

I always love watching the science shows and still do. Of course I watched many commentated by SH and enjoyed his brilliance. I do recall watching one some time ago about God and the improbability (in his mind) that he didn't exist and it actually hurt my heart to hear it. I wanted to be able to communicate to him through the TV that he needed God like we all do and that unbelief is not required in order to maintain scientific credentials. I don't have a list, but there are many scientists in his field who do believe in The Creator....I just wish he had been one of them.
 
Back
Top