Another reason I'm glad Hillary lost

I could not believe she answered to the Harvey Weinstein rapist in this manner considering what she did to the women her perverted husband took advantage of with his position of power:

In an interview with WharBritain’s BBC on Friday, Clinton called Trump a “sexual assaulter.”

Clinton made the comments when asked about the allegations of sexual assault made against Democratic mega-donor and Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.

“This kind of behavior cannot be tolerated anywhere, whether it's in entertainment, politics,” Clinton said. “After all, we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the Oval Office.”

In the same interview, Clinton referred to the sexual transgressions of her husband – former President Bill Clinton – as being “clearly in the past,”

What an effen hypocrite! She is a bad evil woman!
 
I could not believe she answered to the Harvey Weinstein rapist in this manner considering what she did to the women her perverted husband took advantage of with his position of power:

In an interview with WharBritain’s BBC on Friday, Clinton called Trump a “sexual assaulter.”

Clinton made the comments when asked about the allegations of sexual assault made against Democratic mega-donor and Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.

“This kind of behavior cannot be tolerated anywhere, whether it's in entertainment, politics,” Clinton said. “After all, we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the Oval Office.”

In the same interview, Clinton referred to the sexual transgressions of her husband – former President Bill Clinton – as being “clearly in the past,”

What an effen hypocrite! She is a bad evil woman!

Yes, she is. But hypocrisy has become synonymous with the Democratic party in general.
 
Her husband gave them the technology that made their nuke program possible.
Actually, not entirely so. The Agreed Framework was to replace an existing Plutonium reactor with two light water reactors for power which are incapable of producing or using weapons grade material. The USwas also to temporarily provide crude oil to replace the power supposedly lost from the Plutonium reactor which was to be dismantled. The two problems with the Framework were that the fuel rods from the original reactor remained in Pyongyang, and the fuel oil was just a poorly disguised bribe as the original reactor was not even hooked to the grid but obviously being used in the development of weapons.

Bush was rightfully skeptical of Kim's performance under the agreement and instead of enforcing it internationally, he stopped fuel oil shipments as leverage. This was against the advice of Colin Powell. This more obvious violation of the agreement caused Kim to kick out western observers and immediately return to their Plutonium weapons program using the fuel rods that Clinton had foolishly left in country. So Clinton didn't "give" them the fuel, he simply left it there. Nobody knows what would have happened if the Agreed Framework had remained in effect and more aggressively enforced through the means of inspection. Later Clinton officials admitted that the less sophisticated and unrelated program that Bush was given intel on was going to be used as leverage to keep the more powerful Plutonium under western control. That may or may not have worked, but it does show that North Korea has never given up it's nuclear ambitions.

If you want to point fingers with authority, point them at China, Russia, Pakistan, and Iran, the four countries known to share information and in some cases materials with North Korea on the development of nuclear weapons and delivery systems dating as far back as 1956. Just like Iran, a nuclear North Korea may be completely unstoppable without a wholesale change in leadership.
 
Back
Top