Another mass shooting, but this one will not be in the news for very long

cptlo

Pursuit Driver

Ison said a "good Samaritan" witnessed the shooting and shot and killed the shooter.
IMPD said the armed bystander, who shot the shooter, is cooperating with police. The bystander is believed to have had a handgun and chose to intervene when they saw the shooting. Ison said the 22-year-old from Bartholomew County was carrying a gun lawfully.
 
There have been many times when an armed law-abiding citizen shot a robber or someone else attempting to kill others. These are examples of the good the Second Amendment does. Of course, the left says, if nobody had a gun, nobody would be getting shot. The government could attempt to take the guns from the people, but those who would do harm to others would still have theirs.
 
The hero:

And now I bet some crazy lefties are going to attempt to make his life miserable.
You spoke too soon.

 
I'm not surprised about what the gun control advocates are saying following the mall shooting in IN.

On Monday night, CNN reporter Omar Jimenez brought up statistics from Texas State University rapid response training, which purported that of 434 active shooter attacks that have occurred between 2000 and 2021, only 22 ended with an armed bystander neutralizing the shooter.

"If you look at the data, it’s incredibly rare for a bystander with a gun to stop an active shooter, but that’s exactly what happened here," Jimenez said.
Hey Jimenez, that stat proves that more criminals carry guns than law-abiding citizens do. If more law-abiding citizens were to carry guns, perhaps far fewer people would be killed by an active shooter.

A CNN opinion piece from Tuesday similarly asserted that the math on armed citizens stopping shooters "doesn’t quite work." The piece by journalist Jill Filipovic suggested that Dicken still failed to stop the gunman before he harmed others, and knocked him for breaking mall rules.

"Even with a ‘good guy’ present, the Indiana mall shooter was still able to kill three people, injure two and traumatize many others. That's not a victory against gun violence; it's a horrific scenario by any measure. And even the ‘good guy’ with the gun wasn't exactly following the rules -- the mall doesn't allow weapons on its property, and he brought one in anyway," Filipovic wrote.
Hey Jill, are you really that stupid trying to make the good guy here the bad guy to fit your anti-gun agenda? That's a rhetorical question.

On "The View" this week, some of the ABC talk show's hosts fretted over Dicken's actions.

"He had a gun permit, but he wasn’t supposed to be in the mall with a gun," said co-host Sunny Hostin, claiming he broke the law. Fellow co-host Joy Behar said it was a "lucky moment."

You two are just as stupid as Filipovic. Thank God there was an armed citizen who saved the lives of many others.

 
A CNN opinion piece from Tuesday similarly asserted that the math on armed citizens stopping shooters "doesn’t quite work." The piece by journalist Jill Filipovic suggested that Dicken still failed to stop the gunman before he harmed others, and knocked him for breaking mall rules.

"Even with a ‘good guy’ present, the Indiana mall shooter was still able to kill three people, injure two and traumatize many others. That's not a victory against gun violence; it's a horrific scenario by any measure. And even the ‘good guy’ with the gun wasn't exactly following the rules -- the mall doesn't allow weapons on its property, and he brought one in anyway," Filipovic wrote.

Ah... Filipovic, I hope you know that it is illegal to use deadly force on someone UNTIL they have proven to be a risk to life right? Even if he noticed a guy walking around with a rifle, you are not allow to shoot them assuming they are a terrorist. Idiot.
 
Back
Top