a few words of advice for fiction writer wannabes

mei lan

Pursuit Driver
I hate when I'm reading a book and the errors therein cause me to focus on them more than on the book. So, if you are a fiction writer (or non-fiction, but I find these errors by far mostly in fiction books), please, for the love of everything literary, get thyself an editor or three. I'm not talking about spelling errors for those who aren't good spellers, or run-of-the-mill grammar errors. Those can be fixed easily, or if not caught, I can overlook them easily. But in the meantime, here are some tips from me as a reader:

- If you do not know the difference between discreet and discrete, do not use either word.

- If you do not know the difference between pour and pore, do not use either word.

- If you do not know the meaning of the word "nonplussed", do not use the word. It probably does not mean what you think it means.

- In your descriptions, please try to be legit. I was reading a fiction book where the main character was injured and loved ones gathered in an ICU waiting room in a Bozeman, Montana, hospital that smelled like "urine, sweat, bleach, and burned coffee". Srsly? In the United States not in a poor area (which I do not consider Bozeman to be), you experienced an ICU waiting room like this? I've been in nasty nursing homes that didn't smell like that. Come on, people.

- In this same book, a girl was a dr. She was 27 and had been practicing medicine at least a year; she did not enter medical school at a younger age than usual. So she started practicing medicine at 26? I don't think so. Graduate college at 22, graduate medical school at 26, internship for a year, residency for a year or more, putting you at 28 or 29 at the very earliest to begin practicing medicine - and that's without a specialty...add two-four years for that.

- For the love of God, use some creativity in plot devices. In this same book, it's winter, with a storm forecasted when this same dr. drives 30 miles over small mountain roads from Bozeman to home in the late afternoon. She has a flat tire, but cannot call for help, because - you guessed it - her cell phone is dead, and she has no car charger. SRSLY?!?!? I know people are stupid in real life, but give your characters SOME credit and come up with a more believable way to have them be stranded in a winter storm. IRL, in that sort of territory, I would expect people to have satellite phones. (I know from being out there a couple of years ago, I'm not going in a remote area again without a sat phone.)

- Speaking of drs., something I've seen recently a number of times that I find irritating is when characters address doctors as Mr. or Ms. Now, I wouldn't go all Jill Biden (oops, I mean DR. Jill Biden) on anybody if I were a doctor and someone addressed me that way, but if I were a regular person, I wouldn't dream of addressing a dr. as a mr. in a social setting.

- Please make your main characters at least a little bit likeable. I mean, I don't mind if they have character flaws (as do we all), BUT is it too much to ask that they not just be the most irritating, shallow, selfish persons alive? One of the reasons I don't like GWTW is that I vehemently dislike Scarlett O'Hara. IMHO, her only redeeming quality is that she has the grit and determination to take care of her family and friends during the time of stark poverty and horror during and after the war. I don't even give her credit for coming to her senses about Rhett Butler when she had mooned over that fop Ashley Wilkes during the whole book, because even that was in her own self-interest. I just finished a book (I skipped through big parts, because I was irritated) wherein the main character had slept her way through Hollywood for fifteen years, and then decided she wanted to go back to her old boyfriend from her hometown, and was offended when he didn't think she'd changed. If your person is of low character, and you use that as part of your plot, as in when he was 20 he was a complete reprobate, but after fifteen years of prison or the military or hard times due to his own stupidity, he has turned into a person of strong character, that's fine. It's the person who is unchanged from being a horrible person as a main character that irritates me.

- It always helps when you can create interesting/funny/whatever secondary characters. In the Code of Misconduct books, black former-UFC/MMA/whatever fighter Jay Taylor is such a character. I don't dislike the main character, but I love Taylor! Kinda like in the Janet Evanovich books - I read them as much to read about outrageous Lula, hot Ranger, dishy Joe Morelli, and esp. nutty Grandma Mazur, as much as to read about Stephanie Plum and whatever adventure/mess she has gotten herself into.

I'm sure there are more examples, but those will do for now. As you were.
 
Didn't like the book, huh. :)

I agree on having a character that is likable.
I was told the movie Tin Men was a good movie.
I couldn't find one character I liked and I hated the Williams and DeVito characters.

In GWTW, especially the movie, I love Mammie and Rhett, to me the story slows when they are not on the page or screen.
 
Those are a couple of reasons I don't completely discount GWTW. Mammie, Rhett, Melanie, and nutty Prissy redeem the book somewhat.
 
I don't know nutt'in bout birthing no babies but I think you need to seriously consider being a book critic (or is it critique). Sorry but Stradial has the movie critic gig locked up.
 
mei lan date=1439773520 said:
like in the Janet Evanovich books - I read them as much to read about outrageous Lula, hot Ranger, dishy Joe Morelli, and esp. nutty Grandma Mazur, as much as to read about Stephanie Plum and whatever adventure/mess she has gotten herself into.
EXACTLY! Love, love, love Grandma and Lula! I am sad 20 and 21 came out so close together it seems like forever since I have read her books. The next one needs to be 800 pages to make up for it! :tapfoot2 ( It is only 320 pages, due out 11/17...ugh!)
 
You'll have to say a little prayer for Jay in Mosquito Lagoon - Code 3. He's having a rough go of it.

JayTheTerribleTaylor_zps2812cdcf.jpg


At least I knew you weren't referring to the Code series by the description of the stories. PHEW! :huh I'm doing a ton of research for the 3rd book to be accurate. I thought it might have just been me, but I try to manufacture very little and want to be as accurate as possible with people, ages and even buildings and streets. Google maps and street view is a cool tool when you don't have the ability to travel the globe.

And I don't like fantastic and unbelievable action. Something super human that you read and think, "I call BS on that one"

And you are 100% about the editing. That's exactly why I asked 4 independent editors to review the 2nd book and suggest changes. It worked out fabulous this time. I was so grateful for your participation and will happily include you next year if you like 8)

Every individual caught different corrections and made very useful suggestions about other parts of the story. I found that although parents should raise their children, it still takes a village to write a good fiction novel.

:suntn
 
GREAT pic!!! And that's what I was talking about. Like the best ever death scene in Code 2 - it was based on a real example and people could Google it. Also, I'm not talking about literary license, like when authors change certain things to simplify them, like say, changing where a landmark landmarks located or something. I find the authors often tell you what they're doing in the acknowledgments.
 
Back
Top